PHP File Inclusion (RFI/LFI)Weakness · CWE-98

CVE-2026-28124

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in AncoraThemes Notarius notarius allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Notarius: from n/a through <= 1.9.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the AncoraThemes Notarius theme. The vulnerability allows attackers to control the filename used in PHP include/require statements, potentially enabling arbitrary PHP code execution by including malicious files. Affected versions are 1.9 and below.

MitigationRemediate by implementing strict input validation on all file inclusion paths, using whitelist-based validation for allowed files/directories, and avoiding user-supplied input in include/require statements entirely.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Notarius theme version
    Locate the theme's style.css or version.php file within the theme directory and read the declared version number
    Affected if The installed version is 1.9 or lower
  2. Find PHP include/require statements
    Search all PHP files in the theme for include, include_once, require, or require_once statements that use variables in the file path argument
    Affected if Dynamic file inclusion patterns using variables are present in the theme code
  3. Trace user input to include statements
    Examine the identified include/require statements to determine if their path variables receive input from $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or other user-controllable sources without validation
    Affected if User-supplied parameters directly influence the file path in include/require calls without sanitization
  4. Identify accessible entry points
    Locate PHP files that process user requests and pass parameters to the vulnerable include/require logic
    Affected if The vulnerable file inclusion functionality is reachable via web requests

A user is affected if the Notarius theme version is 1.9 or below AND the theme code contains include/require statements that accept unsanitized user input from web requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remediate by implementing strict input validation on all file inclusion paths, using whitelist-based validation for allowed files/directories, and avoiding user-supplied input in include/require statements entirely.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28124 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28124 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data