CVE-2026-28136
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in VeronaLabs WP SMS wp-sms allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WP SMS: from n/a through <= 6.9.12.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in VeronaLabs WP SMS plugin (wp-sms) versions up to 6.9.12 allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands via improper neutralization of special elements in SQL queries. This could enable unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify wp-sms plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'WP SMS' by VeronaLabs, or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the wp-sms folderAffected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Check installed wp-sms versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and find the version number listed under the WP SMS plugin description, or read the main plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/wp-sms/wp-sms.php for the 'Version' tagAffected if Version is 6.9.12 or lower (any version up to and including 6.9.12)
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify the WP SMS plugin shows 'Active' status rather than 'Inactive'Affected if Plugin is currently active and exposed to requests
-
Identify exposed endpointsCheck for publicly accessible WordPress REST API endpoints or admin AJAX actions related to wp-sms (typically under /wp-json/wp-sms/ or admin-ajax.php?action=wp_sms), or review the plugin settings for any exported functionalityAffected if Unauthenticated or low-privilege users can trigger the SQL query functions
User is affected if the wp-sms plugin version is 6.9.12 or lower and the plugin is active with accessible SQL query endpoints
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade WP SMS plugin to version 6.9.13 or later which contains the security fix. Until then, restrict administrative access and monitor for suspicious database query patterns.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28136 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28136 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data