CVE-2026-28268
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Versions prior to 2.1.0 have a business logic vulnerability exists in the password reset mechanism of vikunja/api that allows password reset tokens to be reused indefinitely. Due to a failure to invalidate tokens upon use and a critical logic bug in the token cleanup cron job, reset tokens remain valid forever. This allows an attacker who intercepts a single reset token (via logs, browser history, or phishing) to perform a complete, persistent account takeover at any point in the future, bypassing standard authentication controls. Version 2.1.0 contains a patch for the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVikunja versions before 2.1.0 contain a business logic flaw in the password reset mechanism where reset tokens are never invalidated after use and a logic bug in the token cleanup cron job prevents proper expiration. This allows any intercepted token to remain valid indefinitely, enabling persistent account takeover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Vikunja versionRun 'vikunja version' from the command line, check the admin dashboard version display, or inspect the container/binary version metadataAffected if Version shown is below 2.1.0 (e.g., 2.0.9, 2.0.0, 1.x.x)
-
Locate the Vikunja configuration fileFind the config.yml or config.yaml file used by your deployment, typically in /etc/vikunja/, the application root directory, or the mounted config volumeAffected if Config file exists and the instance is running a version below 2.1.0
-
Inspect the database for reset tokensConnect to the Vikunja database (PostgreSQL, MySQL, or SQLite depending on your setup) and query the users table or token table for password_reset_token or similar fields. Check if any tokens have created_at timestamps far in the past that should have expiredAffected if Database contains password reset tokens with old created_at dates that remain valid (unexpired) in a pre-2.1.0 installation
-
Verify cron job execution statusCheck Vikunja application logs or system cron logs for entries related to 'cleanup', 'token', or 'cron' jobs. Look for successful execution of the token cleanup taskAffected if Logs show no recent token cleanup runs, or the cleanup cron job has failed to run since before the upgrade to 2.1.0
-
Review active password reset tokensQuery the database for any rows in the user table or a tokens table where the password_reset_token field is not null or emptyAffected if Any non-null password reset tokens exist in the database for a pre-2.1.0 installation, as these tokens should have been invalidated but remain usable
You are affected if your Vikunja installation version is below 2.1.0 and the database contains password reset tokens that have not been cleaned up or invalidated.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.0
Upgrade to Vikunja version 2.1.0 or later to obtain the patch that fixes token invalidation and the cron job logic bug.
2.1.0
- Upgrade Vikunja to version 2.1.0 or later to apply the patch that fixes the password reset token reuse vulnerability
- After upgrading, invalidate all existing password reset tokens by clearing the tokens table in the database as a precautionary measure
- Review server logs and authentication logs for any suspicious or unauthorized password reset attempts that may have occurred prior to the upgrade
- If any unauthorized access is detected, force password resets for affected users and consider rotating all user passwords as a precaution
- Monitor for any unusual account activity post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28268 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28268 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data