CVE-2026-28271
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKiteworks is a private data network (PDN). Prior to version 9.2.0, a vulnerability in Kiteworks configuration functionality allows bypassing of SSRF protections through DNS rebinding attacks. Malicious administrators could exploit this to access internal services that should be restricted. Version 9.2.0 contains a patch for the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceKiteworks prior to version 9.2.0 contains a vulnerability in its configuration functionality where SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) protections can be bypassed using DNS rebinding attacks. This allows a malicious administrator to access internal services that should be restricted from external or privileged access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Kiteworks installation versionLocate the Kiteworks installation and retrieve its version number from the system configuration, about page, or version file typically found in the installation directoryAffected if The installed version is below 9.2.0 (e.g., 9.1.x, 9.0.x, earlier versions)
-
Verify configuration functionality is enabledCheck whether the Kiteworks configuration interface or API endpoints are accessible and enabled in the current deploymentAffected if Configuration functionality is exposed and the version is below 9.2.0
-
Confirm network exposure of configuration featuresReview network access controls to determine if the configuration functionality can be reached from external networks or by untrusted usersAffected if Configuration features are network-accessible and the version is below 9.2.0
-
Assess internal service access controlsInspect the system's internal service access policies to identify whether internal resources are intended to be protected from configuration-based requestsAffected if Internal services lack additional network-level protections and the Kiteworks version is below 9.2.0
The environment is affected if the installed Kiteworks version is any release prior to 9.2.0 and the configuration functionality is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.2.0
Upgrade Kiteworks to version 9.2.0 or later to apply the patch. Additionally, review internal service access controls and implement DNS rebinding protections at the network level as defense-in-depth.
Kiteworks 9.2.0
- 1. Backup the current Kiteworks installation and configuration
- 2. Consult Kiteworks upgrade documentation for your current version
- 3. Perform the upgrade to version 9.2.0 following standard upgrade procedures
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful
- 5. Test that SSRF protections are functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28271 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28271 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data