Serv UApplication · Solarwinds

CVE-2026-28309

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2026.3 or later.
See remediation →
97/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click 4 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by a broken access control vulnerability that allows a domain administrator to create system administrator accounts. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SolarWinds Serv-U contains a broken access control vulnerability that permits a domain administrator to create system administrator accounts, resulting in privilege escalation. The CVSS 9.1 score indicates critical severity due to the ability to elevate privileges beyond the intended role boundaries.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches or updates for Serv-U that address the broken access control vulnerability. If no patch is available, implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) policies and monitor administrative account creation activities.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Serv UApplication
Affected:< 2026.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if SolarWinds Serv-U is installed
    Check for Serv-U installation directories or installed programs on the system
    Affected if Serv-U is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed Serv-U version
    Use the Serv-U administrative interface or check the application version through the help/about menu, or locate the version in the installation directory
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 2026.3
  3. Verify domain administrator role configuration
    Review the Serv-U user roles and permissions configuration to confirm domain administrator role exists and its assigned permissions
    Affected if Domain administrator role is configured with permissions that could create elevated accounts
  4. Check for system administrator account creation permissions
    Review the access control settings to determine whether domain administrators have the ability to create system administrator-level accounts
    Affected if Domain administrators have permission to create system administrator accounts beyond their intended role-based access
  5. Audit recent administrative account creation
    Review Serv-U audit logs or administrative activity logs for account creation events, particularly system administrator account creations by domain administrators
    Affected if Domain administrator accounts have recently created system administrator-level accounts

User is affected if running SolarWinds Serv-U version lower than 2026.3 with domain administrator accounts that possess the ability to create system administrator accounts beyond their intended role-based access controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2026.3 or later
Fixed in 2026.3
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches or updates for Serv-U that address the broken access control vulnerability. If no patch is available, implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) policies and monitor administrative account creation activities.

Fix this in Serv U Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,480
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28309 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28309 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data