CVE-2026-28527
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBlueKitchen BTstack versions prior to 1.8.1 contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the AVRCP Controller GET_PLAYER_APPLICATION_SETTING_ATTRIBUTE_TEXT and GET_PLAYER_APPLICATION_SETTING_VALUE_TEXT handlers that allows nearby attackers to read beyond packet boundaries. Attackers can establish a paired Bluetooth Classic connection and send specially crafted VENDOR_DEPENDENT responses to trigger out-of-bounds reads, causing information disclosure and potential crashes on affected devices.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBlueKitchen BTstack versions prior to 1.8.1 contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the AVRCP Controller's GET_PLAYER_APPLICATION_SETTING_ATTRIBUTE_TEXT and GET_PLAYER_APPLICATION_SETTING_VALUE_TEXT handlers. These handlers fail to properly validate packet bounds when processing VENDOR_DEPENDENT responses, allowing an attacker with an established paired Bluetooth Classic connection to read beyond packet boundaries, causing information disclosure and potential crashes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BlueKitchen BTstack installationLocate the BTstack library files or check your project dependencies for BlueKitchen BTstack (typically libbtstack or btstack source files)Affected if BTstack library or source code is present in your environment
-
Determine installed BTstack versionCheck the BTstack version in your build files, package manager, or the version.h/VERSION file within the BTstack source codeAffected if The version is less than 1.8.1 (e.g., 1.8.0, 1.7.x, or any version before 1.8.1)
-
Verify AVRCP Controller is enabledCheck your BTstack configuration (btstack_config.h or similar) for the define BTSTACK_AVRCP_CONTROLLER or AVRCP controller initialization codeAffected if AVRCP Controller support is enabled in your build configuration
-
Confirm VENDOR_DEPENDENT response handling is activeReview your application code or BTstack configuration to confirm the system processes AVRCP VENDOR_DEPENDENT packets for player application setting attribute/value text queriesAffected if Your application uses AVRCP Controller functionality that retrieves player application setting attribute or value text from remote devices
You are affected if BlueKitchen BTstack version is below 1.8.1 AND the AVRCP Controller feature with VENDOR_DEPENDENT response handling is enabled in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.8.1
Upgrade BlueKitchen BTstack to version 1.8.1 or later which contains the fix for this out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the AVRCP handlers.
BTstack 1.8.1
- Identify all deployments of BTstack in your product or system
- Locate the BTstack library or dependency in your build system or package manager
- Consult the BTstack release notes or changelog for version 1.8.1 to confirm the security fix is included
- Update the BTstack dependency or library to version 1.8.1 or later
- Rebuild and recompile your application with the updated BTstack version
- Test the updated firmware/application to ensure Bluetooth Classic functionality (especially AVRCP) still operates correctly
- Verify the update was successful by checking the BTstack version at runtime if your system supports version reporting
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28527 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28527 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data