CVE-2026-28557
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedwpForo Forum 2.4.14 contains a missing capability check vulnerability that allows authenticated users to trigger bulk wpForo usergroup reassignment via the wpforo_synch_roles AJAX handler. Attackers access the usergroups admin page, accessible to any authenticated user, to obtain a nonce, then remap all wpForo usergroups to arbitrary WordPress roles.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencewpForo Forum 2.4.14 lacks proper authorization checks on the wpforo_synch_roles AJAX handler. Any authenticated WordPress user can access this endpoint, which normally should be restricted to administrators. Attackers obtain a valid nonce from the publicly accessible usergroups admin page, then send a crafted request to remap all wpForo usergroups to arbitrary WordPress roles, effectively granting themselves elevated forum privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.16CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm wpForo Forum versionCheck the installed wpForo version in WordPress admin under Plugins, or inspect the version constant in wpforo.php main fileAffected if Version is >= 2.4.0 and < 2.4.16
-
Verify wpforo_synch_roles AJAX endpoint existsCheck if the AJAX action 'wpforo_synch_roles' is registered by inspecting WordPress AJAX hooks or by checking for the action in wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=wpforo_synch_rolesAffected if The endpoint responds (returns any HTTP response) indicating the handler exists
-
Test endpoint access with non-administrator userLog in as a non-admin WordPress user (e.g., subscriber) and attempt a POST request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with action=wpforo_synch_roles and a valid nonce from the usergroups pageAffected if Request is processed without returning a permission denied error (401/403)
-
Inspect code for capability check on handlerExamine the wpforo_synch_roles AJAX handler source code (likely in includes/ajax.php or similar) and look for current_user_can() calls with capabilities like 'manage_options' or 'wpforo_manage_usergroups' before processing role mappingsAffected if No capability check exists, or the check can be bypassed
User is affected if wpForo version is between 2.4.0 and 2.4.15 inclusive AND the wpforo_synch_roles AJAX endpoint processes requests from non-administrator users without proper capability validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.16
Add capability checks (e.g., 'manage_options' or 'wpforo_manage_usergroups' capability) to the wpforo_synch_roles AJAX handler to ensure only administrators can modify usergroup-role mappings. Validate user permissions before processing any role reassignment requests.
wpForo Forum version 2.4.16 or later
- Backup your WordPress site before making any changes
- Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Find 'wpForo Forum' in the plugin list
- Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually upload version 2.4.16 from wordpress.org
- Verify the plugin version is 2.4.16 or higher after updating
- Test that usergroup synchronization works correctly in the wpForo admin area
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28557 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28557 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data