CVE-2026-2862
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability where a reverse proxy and the backend server interpret HTTP requests inconsistently, allowing an attacker to bypass security controls and access sensitive information. The attacker crafts malformed HTTP requests that are interpreted differently by the reverse proxy versus the backend, potentially gaining unauthorized access to protected resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0.0, <= 10.0.9.1>= 10.0.0.0, <= 10.0.9.1>= 11.0.0.0, <= 11.0.2.0>= 11.0.0.0, <= 11.0.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Security Verify Access versionRun 'rpm -q isam' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i verify' or check /opt/ibm/isam/bin/version.sh. For container images, run 'docker inspect <image> | grep -i version' or check labels.Affected if Version falls within 10.0.0.0 to 10.0.9.1 (Security Verify Access) or 11.0.0.0 to 11.2.0 (Verify Identity Access)
-
Identify installed IBM Verify Identity Access versionRun 'rpm -q vii' or check /opt/ibm/vii/bin/version.sh. For container versions, inspect the image for product version labels.Affected if Version falls within 11.0.0.0 to 11.2.0 (Verify Identity Access container)
-
Check if Web Reverse Proxy is configuredLook for configuration files in /var/isd/wa or /opt/ibm/isam/var/ and check for reverse proxy definition XML files (typically in config/wa/rp*.xml or similar paths under the verify access installation directory).Affected if A Web Reverse Proxy instance is defined and enabled in the configuration
-
Verify if reverse proxy is actively listeningRun 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "443|80|8443"' or 'ss -tlnp' to check for processes listening on HTTP/HTTPS ports. Check if the IBM Verify Access httpd or webseald process is running.Affected if The Web Reverse Proxy component (webseald or httpd) is running and accepting connections
You are affected if the installed version is within 10.0.0.0-10.0.9.1 or 11.0.0.0-11.2.0 AND the Web Reverse Proxy feature is configured and active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedConfigure the reverse proxy to strictly validate and normalize incoming HTTP requests, ensuring consistent parsing between the proxy and backend. Apply vendor-provided patches for IBM Security Verify Access and ensure reverse proxy configurations are aligned with backend server expectations.
Security Verify Access 10.0.9.2 or later / Verify Identity Access 11.0.2.1 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of IBM Security Verify Access or IBM Verify Identity Access running in your environment
- 2. Plan for upgrade during a maintenance window
- 3. Backup current configuration and any critical data
- 4. For Security Verify Access: Upgrade from 10.0.0.0-10.0.9.1 to version 10.0.9.2 or later
- 5. For Security Verify Access Container: Upgrade from 10.0.0.0-10.0.9.1 to version 10.0.9.2 or later
- 6. For Verify Identity Access: Upgrade from 11.0.0.0-11.0.2.0 to version 11.0.2.1 or later
- 7. For Verify Identity Access Container: Upgrade from 11.0.0.0-11.0.2.0 to version 11.0.2.1 or later
- 8. After upgrade, verify the reverse proxy configuration is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2862 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2862 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data