CVE-2026-28741
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.12, 11.5.x <= 11.5.0, 11.4.x <= 11.4.2, 11.3.x <= 11.3.2 fail to validate CSRF tokens on an authentication endpoint which allows an attacker to update a user's authentication method via a CSRF attack by tricking a user into visiting a malicious page. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00625
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMattermost fails to validate CSRF tokens on an authentication endpoint, allowing attackers to craft malicious pages that trick authenticated users into unknowingly changing their authentication method. This is a classic CSRF vulnerability where the server does not verify that requests originate from the legitimate application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.11.0, < 10.11.13>= 11.3.0, < 11.3.3>= 11.4.0, < 11.4.3>= 11.5.0, < 11.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mattermost Server versionCheck the version via the Mattermost system console (go to System Console > About) or by making a GET request to the API endpoint /api/v4/system/stats/public, or inspect the version file in the Mattermost installation directoryAffected if Installed version falls within >= 10.11.0, < 10.11.13; >= 11.3.0, < 11.3.3; >= 11.4.0, < 11.4.3; or >= 11.5.0, < 11.5.1
-
Confirm CSRF protection on authentication endpointsInspect HTTP responses from authentication-related endpoints (such as /api/v4/users/me/mfa or account settings endpoints that handle authentication method changes) to verify that the server returns and validates CSRF tokens in request headersAffected if The server does not require or validate CSRF tokens for authentication method change requests
-
Verify if authentication method change feature is accessibleCheck the Mattermost config.json file for enabled authentication providers (such as LDAP, SAML, or OAuth) under PluginSettings, ServiceSettings, or LdapSettings, and determine if users have access to change their authentication method through account settingsAffected if Users can access and modify authentication methods (e.g., enabling/disabling MFA, linking OAuth accounts) while the server runs a vulnerable version
You are affected if your Mattermost Server version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the authentication method change feature is accessible to users without proper CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.11.1311.3.311.4.3
Upgrade to patched Mattermost versions beyond 10.11.12, 11.5.0, 11.4.2, or 11.3.2. As an interim measure, users should avoid visiting untrusted pages while authenticated.
Upgrade to the appropriate fixed version: 10.11.13 (for 10.11.x), 11.3.3 (for 11.3.x), 11.4.3 (for 11.4.x), or 11.5.1 (for 11.5.x)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Mattermost Server version using the system console or mmctl command
- 2. Determine which version branch your installation falls into (10.11.x, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, or 11.5.x)
- 3. For 10.11.x branch: Upgrade to version 10.11.13 or later
- 4. For 11.3.x branch: Upgrade to version 11.3.3 or later
- 5. For 11.4.x branch: Upgrade to version 11.4.3 or later
- 6. For 11.5.x branch: Upgrade to version 11.5.1 or later
- 7. Review Mattermost upgrade documentation for your installation method (manual, Docker, Kubernetes, etc.)
- 8. Create a complete backup of the database and file storage before upgrading
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28741 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28741 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data