CVE-2026-28755
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNGINX Plus and NGINX Open Source have a vulnerability in the ngx_stream_ssl_module module due to the improper handling of revoked certificates when configured with the ssl_verify_client on and ssl_ocsp on directives, allowing the TLS handshake to succeed even after an OCSP check identifies the certificate as revoked. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in NGINX's ngx_stream_ssl_module allows TLS handshakes to succeed even when OCSP validation identifies the client certificate as revoked. When both ssl_verify_client and ssl_ocsp directives are enabled, the OCSP check result is not properly enforced, permitting revoked certificates to authenticate.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= r33= r34= r35= r36>= 0.5.13, <= 0.9.7>= 1.27.2, < 1.28.3>= 1.29.0, < 1.29.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NGINX versionRun 'nginx -v' or 'nginx -V' to obtain the installed version numberAffected if The version falls within affected ranges: F5 Nginx Plus r33, r34, r35, r36; F5 Nginx Open Source 0.5.13-0.9.7, 1.27.2 to <1.28.3, or 1.29.0 to <1.29.7
-
Locate NGINX configuration filesFind all NGINX configuration files, typically in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf and included stream configuration files. Look for 'stream' blocks and their included files.Affected if A stream block exists with SSL configuration
-
Check if client certificate verification is enabledIn stream block configuration, search for 'ssl_verify_client' directive and verify its value is set to 'on' or 'optional'Affected if ssl_verify_client is set to 'on' or 'optional'
-
Check if OCSP validation is enabledIn stream block configuration, search for 'ssl_ocsp' directive and verify it is present and enabledAffected if ssl_ocsp directive is present in the configuration
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable NGINX version AND has both ssl_verify_client (on/optional) and ssl_ocsp directives enabled in a stream block configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.28.31.29.7
Apply vendor-supplied NGINX patches when available. As a temporary workaround, ensure additional certificate validation (such as CRL checking via ssl_crl directive) is in place at the application layer or consider disabling ssl_ocsp until the patch is applied.
Nginx Open Source: 1.28.3 or later (for 1.27.x branch), 1.29.7 or later (for 1.29.x branch); Nginx Plus: r37 or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed Nginx version using 'nginx -v' or 'nginx -V'
- 2. For Nginx Open Source: If running version 1.27.x, upgrade to at least version 1.28.3; if running version 1.29.x, upgrade to at least version 1.29.7
- 3. For Nginx Plus: If running r33, r34, r35, or r36, upgrade to r37 or later
- 4. After upgrade, verify the version matches the expected fixed release
- 5. Test TLS client certificate verification with OCSP validation to confirm revoked certificates are now properly rejected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28755 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28755 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data