CVE-2026-2890
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Formidable Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to a payment integrity bypass in all versions up to, and including, 6.28. This is due to the Stripe Link return handler (`handle_one_time_stripe_link_return_url`) marking payment records as complete based solely on the Stripe PaymentIntent status without comparing the intent's charged amount against the expected payment amount, and the `verify_intent()` function validating only client secret ownership without binding intents to specific forms or actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a PaymentIntent from a completed low-value payment to mark a high-value payment as complete, effectively bypassing payment for goods or services.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Formidable Forms plugin's Stripe Link return handler marks payments as complete based only on the Stripe PaymentIntent status without validating that the charged amount matches the expected amount. Additionally, the verify_intent() function only checks client secret ownership without binding PaymentIntents to specific forms or actions. This allows unauthenticated attackers to reuse a low-value PaymentIntent to complete a high-value payment, effectively stealing goods or services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Formidable Forms plugin is installedCheck your WordPress plugins directory or admin panel for the Formidable Forms plugin and note its current version numberAffected if Formidable Forms plugin is installed and running
-
Identify the installed Formidable Forms versionLocate the main plugin file (usually formidable.php or class-formidable.php) and read the version constant or headerAffected if The installed version does not include the fix for amount validation in Stripe payments
-
Verify Stripe Link integration is activeCheck Formidable Forms settings for Stripe/Stripe Link payment method configuration; look for connected Stripe account and enabled payment formsAffected if Stripe Link payment method is enabled and configured for any form
-
Inspect the payment completion handlerExamine the Stripe return handler code that processes successful payments - look for verify_intent() function calls and check if amount validation occurs against expected values before marking payment completeAffected if The payment handler marks payments complete based solely on PaymentIntent status without comparing the charged amount to the expected/form-defined amount
-
Check for PaymentIntent binding to formsReview how PaymentIntents are created and verified - verify that PaymentIntents are bound to specific form IDs or action IDs during creation and that verify_intent() validates this bindingAffected if PaymentIntents can be reused across different forms or payment amounts without binding validation
A user is affected if they have Formidable Forms with Stripe Link enabled and the payment handler does not validate that the charged amount matches the expected amount or bind PaymentIntents to specific forms before completion.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement server-side amount verification by comparing the PaymentIntent's charged amount against the expected amount before marking payment complete, and bind PaymentIntents to specific forms/actions during creation to prevent reuse across different payments.
Formidable Forms version 6.29 or later
- 1. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate Formidable Forms plugin
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to version 6.29 or later
- 5. Alternatively, download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/formidable-forms/ and upload via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- 6. After updating, verify the Stripe payment integration works correctly by testing a payment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2890 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2890 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data