CVE-2026-29097
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Versions prior to 7.15.1 and 8.9.3 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability combined with a Denial of Service (DoS) condition in the RSS Feed Dashlet component. Versions 7.15.1 and 8.9.3 patch the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability combined with a Denial of Service (DoS) condition in the RSS Feed Dashlet component of SuiteCRM. An attacker can potentially make the server perform requests to arbitrary URLs (SSRF) and cause service disruption (DoS) through the RSS Feed Dashlet.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.15.1>= 8.0.0, < 8.9.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed SuiteCRM versionAccess the SuiteCRM About page (usually at /index.php?action=About) or check the version.php file in the SuiteCRM root directoryAffected if The version is below 7.15.1, or is 8.0.0 through 8.9.2 (8.9.3 and later are patched)
-
Verify if RSS Feed Dashlet is accessibleCheck if the RSS Feed Dashlet module exists and is not disabled in the SuiteCRM module loader or admin panel under Dashlet configurationAffected if The RSS Feed Dashlet is available and can be added to a dashboard by users
-
Check user permissions for DashletsReview the SuiteCRM roles and ACL settings to determine which users can add or configure the RSS Feed DashletAffected if Regular users (non-admin) have permission to add and configure dashlets
-
Inspect RSS Dashlet configuration storageLook for saved dashlet configurations in the database table (typically dashlets table) or config files that reference the RSS Feed DashletAffected if There are active RSS Feed Dashlet configurations present in the system
A user is affected if their SuiteCRM version is below 7.15.1 or between 8.0.0 and 8.9.2 AND the RSS Feed Dashlet is enabled and accessible to users who could trigger the SSRF/DoS condition.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.15.18.9.3
Upgrade SuiteCRM to version 7.15.1 or 8.9.3 or later to patch this vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately possible, consider disabling or restricting the RSS Feed Dashlet until the patch can be applied.
Upgrade to SuiteCRM 7.15.1 (if on 7.x) or SuiteCRM 8.9.3 (if on 8.x)
- 1. Create a complete backup of your SuiteCRM database and all files/directories
- 2. Place your SuiteCRM instance into maintenance mode or take it offline
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version: SuiteCRM 7.15.1 (for 7.x installations) or SuiteCRM 8.9.3 (for 8.x installations) from the official SuiteCRM download repository
- 4. Extract the downloaded package to a temporary location
- 5. Replace the existing SuiteCRM files with the new version files, preserving your config.php and any custom directories (custom/, data/, upload/)
- 6. Clear all cache directories: cache/, upload/cache/, and any opcache/ APCu caches
- 7. Recreate the database schema if the upgrade includes schema changes by running the repair function in the CRM admin panel (Administration > Repair > Quick Repair and Rebuild)
- 8. Verify the RSS Feed Dashlet functionality works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-29097 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-29097 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data