Secure Email GatewayApplication · Seppmail

CVE-2026-29138

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 15.0.3 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows attackers with a specially crafted email address to claim another user's PGP signature as their own.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway versions prior to 15.0.3 contain an identity spoofing vulnerability in PGP signature validation. Attackers can craft a malicious email address that tricks the gateway into attributing another user's PGP signature to the attacker's messages, enabling impersonation of trusted senders.

MitigationUpgrade SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway to version 15.0.3 or later. Verify PGP key associations are correct after the upgrade and monitor for any suspicious signature claims.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Secure Email GatewayApplication
Affected:< 15.0.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway version
    Access the administration console or check system information files to identify the currently installed version. Look for version details in the product's about section, license information, or release notes.
    Affected if The installed version is below 15.0.3
  2. Verify PGP signature validation is enabled
    Check the SEPPmail configuration settings for PGP module status. Look for PGP-related settings in the security or email processing configuration panels.
    Affected if PGP signature validation is actively enabled in the gateway settings
  3. Inspect PGP key associations
    Review the configured PGP public keys and their associated email addresses. Check the keyring or trusted sender mappings within the SEPPmail administration interface.
    Affected if Multiple email addresses are mapped to the same PGP key, or unexpected sender key associations exist
  4. Check email routing logs for signature claims
    Examine mail logs or the PGP verification logs for recent messages. Look for instances where the claimed sender email differs from the email address bound to the PGP key used for verification.
    Affected if Log entries show mismatches between sender email addresses and the PGP keys validating those messages
  5. Review sender whitelist or trusted sender configurations
    Inspect the trusted sender lists and PGP key assignments in the gateway. Verify that only intended email addresses are associated with each PGP key.
    Affected if Unexpected or unauthorized email addresses are listed as trusted senders for PGP-verified messages

You are affected if you are running SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway version prior to 15.0.3 with PGP signature validation enabled, and an attacker could exploit the mismatch between crafted sender addresses and legitimate PGP key bindings.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 15.0.3 or later
Fixed in 15.0.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway to version 15.0.3 or later. Verify PGP key associations are correct after the upgrade and monitor for any suspicious signature claims.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

15.0.3

  1. Download SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway version 15.0.3 or later from the official vendor download site (downloads.seppmail.com)
  2. Review the SEPPmail upgrade documentation for your current version
  3. Apply the upgrade following the vendor's documented upgrade procedure
  4. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the running version is 15.0.3 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Secure Email Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-29138 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-29138 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data