CVE-2026-29205
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect privileges management and insufficient path filtering allow to read arbitrary file on the server via the cpdavd attachment download endpoints.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal and privilege escalation vulnerability in cpdavd's attachment download endpoints allows unauthenticated or improperly authenticated users to read arbitrary files on the server due to insufficient path validation and incorrect privilege enforcement.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 120.1.0, < 136.1.12>= 120.0.0, < 124.0.38>= 126.0.0, < 126.0.59>= 130.0.0, < 130.0.23>= 130.0.23, < 130.0.23>= 132.0.0, < 132.0.32>= 134.0.0, < 134.0.26>= 136.0.0, < 136.0.10>= 120.0.0, < 124.0.38>= 126.0.0, < 126.0.59>= 130.0.0, < 130.0.23>= 132.0.0, < 132.0.32>= 134.0.0, < 134.0.26>= 136.0.0, < 136.0.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if cpdavd service is runningRun 'ps aux | grep cpdavd' or check systemd service status with 'systemctl status cpdavd'Affected if cpdavd process is running and exposed to network access
-
Determine installed cpdavd versionCheck package version via 'rpm -q cpdavd' or 'dpkg -l cpdavd', or inspect '/usr/local/cpanel/version' for cPanel version which includes cpdavdAffected if installed version falls within any vulnerable version range (compare to CVE reference) or version cannot be determined
-
Verify attachment download endpoints are accessibleTest HTTP access to cpdavd paths such as /webmail/attachment or /cgi-sys/attachment endpoints, or review web server configuration for cpdavd alias directivesAffected if cpdavd attachment download endpoints are exposed without authentication or with user-level authentication
-
Check for path traversal protection in cpdavd configurationInspect cpdavd configuration files in /var/cpanel/conf/cpdavd or /usr/local/cpanel/conf/ for path validation settings, and review Apache/Nginx vhost configs for cpdavd-related rewrite rulesAffected if No whitelist-based path validation or traversal sequence filtering is configured for attachment handlers
-
Test for path traversal vulnerabilityIf endpoints are accessible, attempt a controlled test request with '../' sequences (e.g., /webmail/attachment/..%2F..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd) using curl or browser; otherwise review access logs for suspicious traversal patternsAffected if Server responds with file contents outside intended directory or returns unexpected file data in response
A user is affected if cpdavd is running with exposed attachment download endpoints AND lacks proper path validation AND the installed version matches vulnerable releases.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data124.0.38126.0.59130.0.23
Implement strict path canonicalization with allowlist validation, enforce proper authentication and authorization checks on all file access operations, and restrict the web service process to minimum necessary file system permissions.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-29205 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-29205 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data