CVE-2026-3023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNon-relational SQL injection vulnerability (NoSQLi) in the Wakyma web application, specifically in the endpoint 'vets.wakyma.com/pets/print-tags'. This vulnerability could allow an authenticated user to alter a POST request to the affected endpoint for the purpose of injecting NoSQL commands, allowing them to list both pets and owner names.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NoSQL injection vulnerability exists in the Wakyma web application's /pets/print-tags endpoint. Authenticated users can manipulate POST request parameters to inject NoSQL commands, enabling unauthorized enumeration of pet and owner records stored in the non-relational database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Wakyma application is deployedIdentify whether the Wakyma web application is installed or running in your environment. Check for the application codebase, container images, or running services bearing the Wakyma name.Affected if Wakyma is present in your environment
-
Locate the /pets/print-tags endpointSearch your application codebase or API documentation for the /pets/print-tags route handler. Inspect your web server configuration or API routing files to confirm this endpoint exists.Affected if The /pets/print-tags endpoint exists in your deployment
-
Verify POST method is acceptedReview the endpoint handler code to confirm it accepts POST requests and processes request body parameters.Affected if The endpoint accepts POST requests with body parameters
-
Confirm authentication is requiredExamine the endpoint's access controls, middleware, or route protection configuration to determine if authentication is enforced before the request reaches the handler.Affected if Authentication is NOT properly enforced or can be bypassed
-
Check for NoSQL database usageIdentify the database type used by the Wakyma application. Look for NoSQL databases such as MongoDB, CouchDB, or similar in your application configuration or dependencies.Affected if The application uses a NoSQL database and the endpoint interacts with it
Your environment is affected if the Wakyma application is deployed with the /pets/print-tags endpoint that processes POST parameters against a NoSQL database without proper input validation and authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and use parameterized queries or ORM methods for NoSQL databases to prevent injection. Apply least-privilege access controls and audit the endpoint for additional injection points.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data