Hai BuildApplication · Presidio

CVE-2026-30308

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.13.3 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In its design for automatic terminal command execution, HAI Build Code Generator offers two options: Execute safe commands and Execute all commands. The description for the former states that commands determined by the model to be safe will be automatically executed, whereas if the model judges a command to be potentially destructive, it still requires user approval. However, this design is highly susceptible to prompt injection attacks. An attacker can employ a generic template to wrap any malicious command and mislead the model into misclassifying it as a 'safe' command, thereby bypassing the user approval requirement and resulting in arbitrary command execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HAI Build Code Generator's automatic command execution feature uses an LLM to classify commands as 'safe' or requiring approval. The vulnerability allows attackers to use prompt injection templates to wrap malicious commands, causing the model to misclassify them as safe and bypass user approval, enabling arbitrary OS command execution.

MitigationRedesign command classification to use structured input parsing that separates command arguments from instruction text, implement input validation to detect injection patterns, and require additional verification layers before executing any dynamically constructed commands.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Hai BuildApplication
Affected:<= 3.13.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Presidio Hai Build installation
    Locate the HAI Build Code Generator installation directory and identify the executable or service running the product
    Affected if Presidio Hai Build is present on the system
  2. Check installed version
    Run 'hai-build --version' or inspect the product's about/info panel to determine the exact version number
    Affected if Version is 3.13.3 or lower
  3. Verify automatic command execution is enabled
    Inspect the product configuration settings for 'automatic command execution', 'auto-approve', or 'LLM-based command classification' features
    Affected if The automatic command execution feature with LLM classification is turned on
  4. Examine command execution logs
    Review command execution audit logs for entries showing commands classified as 'safe' that contain unusual patterns (wrapping characters, instruction text mixed with commands)
    Affected if Logs show commands that bypassed approval despite containing injection-style patterns
  5. Inspect command input handling
    Check if the system accepts raw command input through API, CLI, or UI without structured input parsing that separates instruction text from arguments
    Affected if User-provided commands are passed directly to the LLM without input separation or validation

A user is affected if Presodio Hai Build version 3.13.3 or lower is installed with the automatic LLM-based command classification feature enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.13.3
Interim mitigation

Redesign command classification to use structured input parsing that separates command arguments from instruction text, implement input validation to detect injection patterns, and require additional verification layers before executing any dynamically constructed commands.

Fix this in Hai Build Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation20.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,288.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30308 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30308 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data