Auto Approval ModulePlugin / extension · Ridvay

CVE-2026-30311

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Ridvay Code's command auto-approval module contains a critical OS command injection vulnerability that renders its whitelist security mechanism completely ineffective. The system relies on fragile regular expressions to parse command structures; while it attempts to intercept dangerous operations, it fails to account for standard Shell command substitution Ridvay Code (specifically$(...)and backticks ...). An attacker can construct a command such as git log --grep="$(malicious_command)", forcing Syntx to misidentify it as a safe git operation and automatically approve it. The underlying Shell prioritizes the execution of the malicious code injected within the arguments, resulting in Remote Code Execution without any user interaction.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Ridvay Code's command auto-approval module uses regex-based whitelisting to validate git commands but fails to sanitize command substitution syntax $(...) and backticks. Attackers can embed malicious commands inside git arguments like --grep="$(malicious_command)", causing the whitelist to approve the command while the underlying shell executes the injected payload, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution.

MitigationImplement strict input sanitization that rejects or properly escapes shell metacharacters including $(...), `...`, and other command substitution syntax in all command arguments, or use shell-execution-safe APIs that avoid shell interpretation entirely.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Auto Approval ModulePlugin / extension
Affected:<= 0.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Ridvay Code installation and version
    Locate the Ridvay Code installation directory and check the package.json, setup.py, or version file for the auto-approval module. Common paths may include node_modules/ridvay-auto-approval or a vendor/ridvay directory. Run 'npm list ridvay-auto-approval' or 'pip show ridvay-auto-approval' if using package managers.
    Affected if The installed version is 0.1.1 or lower.
  2. Verify auto-approval module is enabled
    Check the Ridvay configuration files (such as .ridvayrc, ridvay.config.js, or settings.json) for entries enabling the auto-approval module or git command validation features.
    Affected if The auto-approval module is enabled and processing git commands.
  3. Inspect the regex whitelist implementation
    Locate the source file implementing the git command validation, typically named something like whitelist.js, validator.js, or approval.js within the Ridvay module directory. Examine the regex pattern used for command validation.
    Affected if The validation uses regex-based whitelisting without explicit blocking of shell metacharacters.
  4. Test for shell injection vulnerability
    If you have access to the git command input flow, examine how arguments are processed. Look for code that passes git arguments to a shell execution function (such as exec(), system(), or child_process with shell: true) without sanitizing $() or backtick syntax.
    Affected if Git arguments containing $(...) or backtick expressions are passed to shell execution without filtering.

You are affected if Ridvay Auto Approval Module version 0.1.1 or lower is installed, the auto-approval feature is enabled, and git commands are processed through regex-based validation that does not block shell command substitution syntax.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.1.1
Interim mitigation

Implement strict input sanitization that rejects or properly escapes shell metacharacters including $(...), `...`, and other command substitution syntax in all command arguments, or use shell-execution-safe APIs that avoid shell interpretation entirely.

Fix this in Auto Approval Module Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30311 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30311 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data