CVE-2026-30498
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in the delete.php endpoint of Jason2605 AdminPanel 4.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the delete.php endpoint of Jason2605 AdminPanel 4.0, allowing authenticated administrators to be tricked into performing unintended delete operations through malicious requests from other sites.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AdminPanel versionLocate the version file or header in the Jason2605 AdminPanel installation (commonly in a version.php, about.php, or admin footer). Compare the installed version to 4.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.0 (or falls within any 4.x range if additional version data becomes available).
-
Locate delete.php endpointFind the delete.php file within the admin panel directory structure, typically under /admin/, /panel/, or the root admin directory.Affected if delete.php exists in the installation and is accessible via the web server.
-
Inspect delete.php for CSRF token validationOpen delete.php in a text editor or use 'grep -i token' / 'grep -i csrf' to search the source code. Look for checks that validate a token parameter or session variable before performing delete operations.Affected if delete.php contains no code that validates an anti-CSRF token (synchronizer token pattern) before processing delete requests.
-
Check delete.php for Origin/Referer header validationSearch the delete.php source code for $_SERVER['HTTP_ORIGIN'], $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'], or similar header validation logic that verifies request origin.Affected if delete.php does not validate Origin or Referer headers to ensure requests originate from legitimate sources.
-
Verify admin authentication requirementCheck if delete.php requires a valid admin session (logged-in state) before allowing delete operations by examining session checks or authentication includes.Affected if delete.php requires admin authentication (which makes this a CSRF risk for authenticated admins).
If you are running Jason2605 AdminPanel 4.0 with the delete.php endpoint present and that file lacks both anti-CSRF token validation and Origin/Referer header checks, your environment is affected by CVE-2026-30498.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations including delete.php, and validate Origin/Referer headers to ensure requests originate from legitimate sources.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30498 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30498 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data