EsiclivreApplication

CVE-2026-30655

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.2.2 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection in Solicitante::resetaSenha() in esiclivre/esiclivre v0.2.2 and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information via the cpfcnpj parameter in /reset/index.php

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in esiclivre v0.2.2 and earlier allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through the cpfcnpj parameter in the /reset/index.php endpoint via the Solicitante::resestaSenha() function, enabling unauthorized access to sensitive database information.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of esiclivre that implements proper input validation and parameterized queries for the cpfcnpj parameter. Alternatively, apply web application firewall rules to block SQL injection payloads until the code fix can be deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EsiclivreApplication
Affected:<= 0.2.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Esiclivre version
    Check for a version file, configuration file, or meta information in the application root. Common locations include version.php, VERSION.txt, or the main configuration file. Also check the HTTP Server header or any version disclosure in error pages.
    Affected if The discovered version is 0.2.2 or any version lower than 0.2.2
  2. Verify the /reset/index.php endpoint exists
    Confirm the presence of the reset directory and index.php file in the web application root directory. This endpoint handles password reset requests.
    Affected if The /reset/index.php file exists and is accessible via web requests
  3. Confirm the cpfcnpj parameter is processed by Solicitante::resestaSenha()
    Locate the Solicitante class file and examine the resestaSenha() method to verify it accepts and processes the cpfcnpj parameter. Check if this parameter is passed directly to database queries without proper escaping or parameterized queries.
    Affected if The cpfcnpj parameter is used in SQL queries without input validation or prepared statements
  4. Test for SQL injection vulnerability
    Send a crafted request to /reset/index.php with a cpfcnpj value containing SQL injection syntax (such as cpfcnpj=1' OR '1'='1). Observe if the application returns database errors or behaves differently than expected.
    Affected if The application responds with SQL errors or unexpected behavior indicating unsanitized input is being executed as SQL code

A system is affected if it runs Esiclivre version 0.2.2 or lower AND has the /reset/index.php endpoint accessible, where the cpfcnpj parameter is processed by the Solicitante::resestaSenha() function without SQL injection protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.2.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of esiclivre that implements proper input validation and parameterized queries for the cpfcnpj parameter. Alternatively, apply web application firewall rules to block SQL injection payloads until the code fix can be deployed.

Fix this in Esiclivre Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30655 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30655 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data