CVE-2026-30793
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Flutter URI scheme handler, FFI bridge modules) allows Privilege Escalation. This vulnerability is associated with program files flutter/lib/common.Dart, src/flutter_ffi.Rs and program routines URI handler for rustdesk://password/, bind.MainSetPermanentPassword(). This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in RustDesk Client's Flutter URI scheme handler (rustdesk://password/) enables unauthenticated attackers to invoke the MainSetPermanentPassword() function via the FFI bridge, allowing privilege escalation by setting or changing the user's password without proper session validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.4.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if RustDesk client is installedOn Windows, check Program Files or Add/Remove Programs for 'RustDesk'. On Linux, run 'which rustdesk' or check for rustdesk in package manager. On macOS, check /Applications for RustDesk.app.Affected if RustDesk is installed on the system
-
Identify the installed RustDesk versionRun 'rustdesk --version' from command line, or on Windows right-click rustdesk.exe and view Properties > Details for the version number. Check the About section within the RustDesk client interface.Affected if The installed version is 1.4.5 or lower (any version up to and including 1.4.5)
-
Check if RustDesk server/relay services are runningOn Windows, open Services or Task Manager and look for 'rustdesk' processes. On Linux, run 'ps aux | grep rustdesk' to check for running rustdesk-s, rustdesk-relay, or rustdesk-p2p processes.Affected if RustDesk services are running and accessible on the network (these services accept the vulnerable URI handler connections)
-
Verify URI scheme handler configurationCheck if the rustdesk:// URI scheme is registered as a handler. On Windows, search registry for 'rustdesk' under HKCU\Software\Classes or HKLM\Software\Classes. Look for entries under .rustdesk or rustdesk:// protocol handler.Affected if The rustdesk:// URI scheme is registered and accessible to local or remote applications
The environment is affected if RustDesk version 1.4.5 or lower is installed and the rustdesk:// URI scheme handler is active and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patch when available; until then, restrict access to the application, disable URI handler registration if possible, and monitor for suspicious rustdesk:// URI invocations.
RustDesk Client version 1.4.6 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of RustDesk Client by checking the application or its installation directory
- 2. Navigate to the official RustDesk GitHub releases page or official download page
- 3. Download the latest stable release version newer than 1.4.5
- 4. Uninstall the current RustDesk Client version
- 5. Install the newly downloaded version
- 6. Verify the installation was successful and confirm the version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30793 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data