CVE-2026-3082
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGStreamer JPEG Parser Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GStreamer. Interaction with this library is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation. The specific flaw exists within the processing of Huffman tables. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-28840.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in GStreamer's JPEG parser during Huffman table processing. The vulnerability results from missing length validation before copying user-supplied data to a fixed-size heap buffer, allowing remote code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.28.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GStreamer installation and versionRun 'gst-inspect-1.0 --version' or check your system's package manager for gstreamer version (dpkg -l | grep gstreamer, rpm -qa | grep gstreamer, or brew list --versions gstreamer)Affected if Installed version is lower than 1.28.1
-
Confirm JPEG parsing component is presentRun 'gst-inspect-1.0 jpegdec' or 'gst-inspect-1.0 jpegparse' to verify the JPEG decoder/parser plugin is availableAffected if The jpegdec or jpegparse plugin is installed and loadable
-
Verify Huffman table processing is in useInspect any media pipelines or applications that process JPEG files through GStreamer (check for files like .mp4, .avi, .mov that contain JPEG streams, or direct JPEG image loading)Affected if GStreamer is actively parsing JPEG files containing Huffman table data
-
Check for untrusted JPEG input sourcesReview logs or network sources that feed JPEG content to GStreamer-based applications (surveillance feeds, media servers, file upload processing)Affected if GStreamer processes JPEG from untrusted or network-based sources
You are affected if GStreamer version is below 1.28.1 and the system parses JPEG files through GStreamer's Huffman table processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.28.1
Apply vendor patches for GStreamer when available. Until then, validate all JPEG inputs before processing and consider sandboxing media parsing components to limit exploitation impact.
GStreamer 1.28.1 or later
- 1. Identify the current GStreamer version installed on the system using your package manager (e.g., `gst-inspect-1.0 --version` or checking via apt/yum/dnf).
- 2. Update the GStreamer packages to version 1.28.1 or later using the system's package manager (e.g., `sudo apt update && sudo apt install libgstreamer1.0-dev gstreamer1.0-plugins-*` or equivalent).
- 3. Verify the installed version meets the minimum fixed version requirement (1.28.1 or newer).
- 4. Restart any applications or services that use GStreamer to ensure the updated libraries are loaded.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3082 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- gitlab.freedesktop.org
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3082 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data