HoppscotchApplication

CVE-2026-30825

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2026.2.1 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem. Prior to version 2026.2.1, the DELETE /v1/access-tokens/revoke endpoint allows any authenticated user to delete any other user's PAT by providing its ID, with no ownership verification. This issue has been patched in version 2026.2.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The DELETE /v1/access-tokens/revoke endpoint in hoppscotch suffers from an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability. Any authenticated user can revoke any other user's Personal Access Token (PAT) by providing its ID, as the endpoint only verifies authentication but not token ownership.

MitigationUpgrade to hoppscotch version 2026.2.1 or later, which implements proper ownership verification before allowing token revocation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
HoppscotchApplication
Affected:< 2026.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Hoppscotch version
    Check the version displayed in the Hoppscotch application UI (usually in Settings > About) or query the backend API version endpoint if available
    Affected if The version is lower than 2026.2.1 (e.g., 2026.2.0, 2026.1.x, etc.)
  2. Verify the backend API is reachable
    Confirm the Hoppscotch backend server is accessible and responding to requests
    Affected if The backend API is running and accessible to users
  3. Check if authentication is enabled on the revoke endpoint
    Send an authenticated request to DELETE /v1/access-tokens/revoke with any valid token ID to confirm the endpoint accepts authenticated requests
    Affected if The endpoint accepts authenticated requests and processes revocation without validating token ownership
  4. Confirm users can access other users token IDs
    Determine whether users can enumerate or obtain token IDs belonging to other users through API responses or other endpoints
    Affected if Token IDs of other users are accessible or guessable through the API

You are affected if your Hoppscotch instance version is below 2026.2.1 and the revoke endpoint is accessible to authenticated users without ownership verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2026.2.1 or later
Fixed in 2026.2.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to hoppscotch version 2026.2.1 or later, which implements proper ownership verification before allowing token revocation.

Recommended fix High confidence

2026.2.1

  1. 1. Identify the current Hoppscotch version currently deployed in your environment
  2. 2. Back up any critical data such as existing access tokens and user configurations
  3. 3. Upgrade Hoppscotch to version 2026.2.1 or later, following the official upgrade instructions for your deployment method
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
  5. 5. Test the DELETE /v1/access-tokens/revoke endpoint to confirm it now properly validates token ownership before allowing revocation
  6. 6. Ensure all users re-authenticate if necessary after the patch

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Hoppscotch Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30825 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30825 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data