CVE-2026-30833
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRocket.Chat is an open-source, secure, fully customizable communications platform. Prior to versions 7.10.8, 7.11.5, 7.12.5, 7.13.4, 8.0.2, 8.1.1, and 8.2.0, a NoSQL injection vulnerability exists in Rocket.Chat's account service used in the ddp-streamer micro service that allows unauthenticated attackers to manipulate MongoDB queries during authentication. The vulnerability is located in the username-based login flow where user-supplied input is directly embedded into a MongoDB query selector without validation. An attacker can inject MongoDB operator expressions (e.g., { $regex: '.*' }) in place of a username string, causing the database query to match unintended user records. This issue has been patched in versions 7.10.8, 7.11.5, 7.12.5, 7.13.4, 8.0.2, 8.1.1, and 8.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NoSQL injection vulnerability in Rocket.Chat's ddp-streamer microservice allows unauthenticated attackers to manipulate MongoDB queries during the username-based login flow by injecting MongoDB operator expressions (e.g., $regex) into the username field, enabling matching of unintended user records.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.10.8>= 7.11.0, < 7.11.5>= 7.12.0, < 7.12.5>= 7.13.0, < 7.13.4>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.1= 8.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Rocket.Chat is accessibleSend an HTTP request to your Rocket.Chat server home page or check if port 3000 (or your configured port) is listening and respondingAffected if The server is reachable and running Rocket.Chat software
-
Identify the installed Rocket.Chat versionQuery the Rocket.Chat API endpoint /api/info or check the package.json/version file in the Rocket.Chat installation directoryAffected if The returned version falls within any of these ranges: < 7.10.8; >= 7.11.0 and < 7.11.5; >= 7.12.0 and < 7.12.5; >= 7.13.0 and < 7.13.4; >= 8.0.0 and < 8.0.2; >= 8.1.0 and < 8.1.1; or equals 8.2.0
-
Determine if the ddp-streamer microservice is deployedInspect your deployment configuration (docker-compose.yml, Kubernetes manifests, or service inventory) for a ddp-streamer service componentAffected if The ddp-streamer microservice is present in your deployment
-
Verify username-based authentication is enabledCheck the Rocket.Chat authentication settings in the admin panel under 'Login' section, or inspect the accounts configuration for Username login methodAffected if Username/password authentication with direct username lookup is enabled as a login option
If Rocket.Chat is running with an affected version AND the ddp-streamer microservice is present AND username-based login is enabled, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2026-30833.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.10.87.11.57.12.5
Upgrade to versions 7.10.8, 7.11.5, 7.12.5, 7.13.4, 8.0.2, 8.1.1, or 8.2.0 which contain the patch for proper input validation.
Upgrade to version 8.2.0 (or the latest 8.x stable release)
- 1. Back up your Rocket.Chat database and configuration files before proceeding
- 2. Identify your current Rocket.Chat version by checking the admin panel or running `rocketchatctl status` or checking the container/logs
- 3. If your current version is < 7.10.8: upgrade directly to 7.10.8 or later (recommended: 8.2.0)
- 4. If your current version is >= 7.11.0 and < 7.11.5: upgrade to 7.11.5 or later (recommended: 8.2.0)
- 5. If your current version is >= 7.12.0 and < 7.12.5: upgrade to 7.12.5 or later (recommended: 8.2.0)
- 6. If your current version is >= 7.13.0 and < 7.13.4: upgrade to 7.13.4 or later (recommended: 8.2.0)
- 7. Use your deployment method (Docker, snap, or manual) to perform the upgrade following the official Rocket.Chat upgrade documentation
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in the admin panel
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30833 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30833 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data