CVE-2026-30877
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedbaserCMS is a website development framework. Prior to version 5.2.3, there is an OS command injection vulnerability in the update functionality. Due to this issue, an authenticated user with administrator privileges in baserCMS can execute arbitrary OS commands on the server with the privileges of the user account running baserCMS. This issue has been patched in version 5.2.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in baserCMS update functionality allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary OS commands on the server with the privileges of the baserCMS process user. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 5.2.3.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify baserCMS versionCheck the installed baserCMS version number in the admin dashboard under system information or in the version configuration fileAffected if Version is below 5.2.3
-
Verify update module accessibilityConfirm the update functionality is present and accessible within the baserCMS admin panelAffected if Update module is enabled and accessible to administrators
-
Confirm admin account presenceDetermine whether any active administrator accounts exist in the baserCMS user databaseAffected if At least one authenticated administrator user exists in the system
System is affected if baserCMS version is lower than 5.2.3 and the update feature is available to authenticated admin users, allowing command injection via that functionality
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.3
Upgrade to baserCMS version 5.2.3 or later to patch the vulnerability. Additionally, enforce least-privilege principles for admin accounts and consider network segmentation to limit exposure.
5.2.3
- 1. Backup your current baserCMS installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Download baserCMS version 5.2.3 from the official baserCMS repository or website.
- 3. Follow the official upgrade instructions for baserCMS to update from your current version to 5.2.3.
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the baserCMS admin panel.
- 5. Confirm the version number displays as 5.2.3 after upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30877 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30877 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data