CVE-2026-30921
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOneUptime is a solution for monitoring and managing online services. Prior to 10.0.20, OneUptime Synthetic Monitors allow low-privileged project users to submit custom Playwright code that is executed on the oneuptime-probe service. In the current implementation, this untrusted code is run inside Node's vm and is given live host Playwright objects such as browser and page. This creates a distinct server-side RCE primitive: the attacker does not need the classic this.constructor.constructor(...) sandbox escape. Instead, the attacker can directly use the injected Playwright browser object to reach browser.browserType().launch(...) and spawn an arbitrary executable on the probe host/container. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.20.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOneUptime Synthetic Monitors prior to 10.0.20 allows low-privileged project users to submit custom Playwright code that executes on the oneuptime-probe service. The code runs in Node's vm with live Playwright objects (browser, page) exposed to the untrusted code, enabling direct RCE via browser.browserType().launch() to spawn arbitrary executables on the probe host/container - no sandbox escape is required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed OneUptime versionLocate the OneUptime installation and identify its version number. Common locations include: package.json in the application root, a version file, Docker image tag, or the admin dashboard About section.Affected if The installed version is lower than 10.0.20 (e.g., 10.0.19, 10.0.10, any 9.x version)
-
Verify Synthetic Monitors feature statusAccess the OneUptime admin panel or configuration and determine whether the Synthetic Monitors feature is enabled for any project.Affected if Synthetic Monitors is enabled and the OneUptime version is below 10.0.20
-
Review low-privileged user access to Synthetic MonitorsExamine user role permissions and project access settings to determine if non-admin users (project users, standard users) have permissions to create or edit Synthetic Monitors.Affected if Low-privileged users (non-admin) have create/edit permissions on Synthetic Monitors and the version is below 10.0.20
-
Inspect oneuptime-probe service configurationLocate the probe service configuration file or environment variables to confirm the probe is running and accessible to user-submitted Playwright code execution.Affected if The oneuptime-probe service is running and accessible, Synthetic Monitors is enabled, and version is below 10.0.20
The environment is affected if OneUptime version is below 10.0.20 AND the Synthetic Monitors feature is enabled, allowing low-privileged users to execute arbitrary code via exposed Playwright objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.20
Upgrade to OneUptime version 10.0.20 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, disable or restrict low-privileged user access to the Synthetic Monitors feature and implement network isolation for probe services.
OneUptime version 10.0.20
- Identify all OneUptime deployments running versions prior to 10.0.20
- Upgrade OneUptime to version 10.0.20 or later
- After upgrade, verify the version is 10.0.20 or higher in the OneUptime admin interface
- Test synthetic monitor functionality to ensure legitimate monitoring workflows still operate correctly
- Review any synthetic monitor configurations that may have relied on the previous behavior
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30921 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30921 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data