Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2026-31016

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Squidex.io Squidex CMS v.7.21.0 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the IdentityServer account profile endpoint

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Squidex CMS versions 7.21.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to escalate privileges by tricking authenticated users into submitting forged requests to the IdentityServer account profile endpoint, potentially allowing the attacker to modify user profile data and permissions.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on the IdentityServer account profile endpoint and other state-changing operations, configure SameSite cookie attributes, and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent forged requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Squidex version
    Log into the Squidex admin interface and navigate to Settings > About, or inspect the Squidex version from the deployment configuration/package metadata
    Affected if The version is 7.21.0 or earlier (including any 7.x version below 7.21.0)
  2. Confirm IdentityServer profile endpoint exists
    Locate the IdentityServer endpoints in the Squidex installation directory or check the application's endpoint configuration for /identity-server/account/profile or similar paths
    Affected if The IdentityServer account profile endpoint is present and accessible without additional authentication beyond session cookies
  3. Verify CSRF token presence on profile operations
    Inspect the HTML forms on the account profile page (or API endpoints for profile updates) and check for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens in request headers or form fields. Use browser developer tools or curl to examine requests to the profile update endpoint
    Affected if No anti-CSRF token (synchronizer token) is required or validated for state-changing profile operations
  4. Check SameSite cookie attributes
    Examine the authentication cookies set by Squidex/IdentityServer using browser developer tools (Application > Cookies) or by inspecting Set-Cookie headers in HTTP responses
    Affected if Authentication cookies have SameSite=None or no SameSite attribute set, or SameSite=Lax without proper CSRF token validation
  5. Validate Origin/Referer header checks
    Review the IdentityServer configuration or source code for server-side validation of Origin and Referer headers on state-changing POST/PUT/DELETE requests to profile endpoints
    Affected if The application does not validate Origin or Referer headers before processing profile changes

You are affected if running Squidex CMS version 7.21.0 or earlier AND the IdentityServer account profile endpoint lacks anti-CSRF token protection, proper SameSite cookie attributes, and Origin/Referer header validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on the IdentityServer account profile endpoint and other state-changing operations, configure SameSite cookie attributes, and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent forged requests.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31016 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31016 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data