NexentApplication

CVE-2026-31216

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The nexent v1.7.5.2 backend service contains an unauthorized arbitrary storage file deletion vulnerability in its file management API. The DELETE /storage/{object_name:path} endpoint lacks authentication, authorization, and input validation mechanisms. Unauthenticated remote attackers can send crafted requests with a user-controlled object_name path parameter to delete arbitrary files from the underlying MinIO storage system. Successful exploitation leads to data loss and denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The nexent v1.7.5.2 backend service has a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in its DELETE /storage/{object_name:path} endpoint. The API lacks authentication, authorization, and input validation, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to manipulate the object_name path parameter to delete arbitrary files from the underlying MinIO storage system, causing data loss and denial of service.

MitigationImplement authentication and authorization checks on the DELETE endpoint, add strict input validation to prevent path traversal, and enforce allowlist-based file deletion policies to restrict which files can be deleted.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NexentApplication
Affected:= 1.7.5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Nexent version
    Check the installed version of Nexent Nexent using package manager, software inventory, or application version command (e.g., nexent --version, rpm -q nexent, or check installed packages)
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.7.5.2
  2. Confirm DELETE /storage endpoint exists
    Review API documentation or network traffic logs to verify the DELETE /storage/{object_name:path} endpoint is exposed in the deployment
    Affected if The endpoint is exposed and accessible to network clients
  3. Verify authentication on storage deletion endpoint
    Inspect API configuration, web server settings, or proxy rules to determine if authentication is enforced on the DELETE /storage endpoint
    Affected if Authentication is NOT configured or is bypassed for this endpoint
  4. Check for path traversal protections
    Review API security settings, input validation rules, or web application firewall (WAF) configuration to see if path traversal prevention exists for the object_name parameter
    Affected if No input validation or path traversal guards are in place for the object_name parameter
  5. Test endpoint accessibility from unauthenticated perspective
    If authorized for security assessment, send a minimal DELETE request to /storage/testpath (using a non-destructive path) from an unauthenticated context to verify the endpoint accepts requests without credentials
    Affected if The endpoint processes requests without requiring authentication credentials

Your environment is affected if you are running Nexent version 1.7.5.2 and the DELETE /storage endpoint is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement authentication and authorization checks on the DELETE endpoint, add strict input validation to prevent path traversal, and enforce allowlist-based file deletion policies to restrict which files can be deleted.

Fix this in Nexent Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31216 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data