CVE-2026-31922
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Ays Pro Fox LMS fox-lms allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Fox LMS: from n/a through <= 1.0.6.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAys Pro Fox LMS version 1.0.6.3 and earlier contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability in the fox-lms component. The application fails to properly neutralize special characters in SQL queries, allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL code through user-supplied input. Successful exploitation enables attackers to extract sensitive data from the database by observing application behavior differences between true and false query conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Fox LMS installationInspect the web application's file structure or admin panel for the presence of Fox LMS (look for fox-lms directory, or check application name/version in the admin dashboard or installer files)Affected if Fox LMS is not installed on the system, then this CVE does not apply
-
Determine installed Fox LMS versionLocate and read the version file or configuration file within the Fox LMS installation directory (commonly named version.php, or check the main index file for version strings)Affected if The installed version is 1.0.6.3 or any earlier version (versions 1.0.6.3 and below are affected)
-
Verify fox-lms component is activeCheck the application's module/component list in the admin panel or examine the fox-lms directory for active PHP files handling requestsAffected if The fox-lms component is present and enabled in the application configuration
-
Identify user input points in fox-lmsReview the fox-lms component source code for parameters that accept user-supplied input (GET/POST parameters, especially search fields, IDs, or form inputs) that are used in database queries without proper sanitizationAffected if User-controllable input is being passed directly to SQL queries within the fox-lms component
You are affected if Fox LMS version 1.0.6.3 or earlier is installed, the fox-lms component is enabled, and user-supplied input is processed through SQL queries in that component without parameterization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Fox LMS to a version beyond 1.0.6.3 that includes the security patch. In the interim, implement input validation and parameterize all database queries to prevent SQL injection attacks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31922 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31922 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data