SuricataApplication · Oisf

CVE-2026-31932

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.0.15 / 8.0.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine. Prior to versions 7.0.15 and 8.0.4, inefficiency in KRB5 buffering can lead to performance degradation. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.15 and 8.0.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability in Suricata's KRB5 (Kerberos 5) protocol parsing. Prior to versions 7.0.15 and 8.0.4, inefficient buffering in KRB5 handling causes performance degradation that can be exploited to degrade or exhaust Suricata's processing capabilities when processing Kerberos traffic.

MitigationUpgrade Suricata to version 7.0.15 or 8.0.4 or later. In the interim, consider filtering or rate-limiting KRB5 traffic at network perimeter if possible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SuricataApplication
Affected:< 7.0.15>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Suricata version
    Run `suricata --version` to identify the installed version
    Affected if Version is less than 7.0.15, or greater than or equal to 8.0.0 but less than 8.0.4
  2. Locate Suricata configuration file
    Find the suricata.yaml configuration file, typically in /etc/suricata/ or /usr/local/etc/
    Affected if Configuration file cannot be located to verify protocol settings
  3. Verify KRB5 protocol detection is enabled
    In suricata.yaml, search for `app-layer` and `protocols` sections; look for `krb5` or `kerberos` entries under enabled protocols
    Affected if KRB5/Kerberos 5 protocol detection is enabled in the configuration
  4. Check if KRB5 traffic is being processed
    Review Suricata eve.json logs for krb5-related events, or use `suricata --list-app-layer-protocols` to confirm KRB5 is compiled/enabled
    Affected if Suricata is actively processing or capable of processing Kerberos traffic

User is affected if Suricata version is below 7.0.15 or between 8.0.0 and 8.0.4, AND KRB5 protocol detection is enabled in the configuration with Kerberos traffic present.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.0.15 / 8.0.4 or later
Fixed in 7.0.158.0.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Suricata to version 7.0.15 or 8.0.4 or later. In the interim, consider filtering or rate-limiting KRB5 traffic at network perimeter if possible.

Recommended fix High confidence

Suricata 7.0.15 (for 7.0.x line) or 8.0.4 (for 8.0.x line)

  1. Identify your current Suricata version using `suricata --version`
  2. If running version 7.0.x (below 7.0.15), plan upgrade to version 7.0.15
  3. If running version 8.0.x (below 8.0.4), plan upgrade to version 8.0.4
  4. Backup your current Suricata configuration files (typically in /etc/suricata/)
  5. Stop the Suricata service: `systemctl stop suricata`
  6. Upgrade Suricata using your package manager (e.g., `apt update && apt install suricata` or `yum update suricata`)
  7. Verify the new version installed: `suricata --version`
  8. Restart the Suricata service: `systemctl start suricata`
Caveat Minor version upgrades typically low risk; test in staging environment before production deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Suricata Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,540
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31932 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31932 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data