SuricataApplication · Oisf

CVE-2026-31935

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.0.15 / 8.0.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine. Prior to versions 7.0.15 and 8.0.4, flooding of craft HTTP2 continuation frames can lead to memory exhaustion, usually resulting in the Suricata process being shut down by the operating system. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.15 and 8.0.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Suricata versions prior to 7.0.15 and 8.0.4 are vulnerable to memory exhaustion via crafted HTTP2 continuation frames. An attacker can flood the engine with these frames, causing memory to fill up until the operating system terminates the Suricata process.

MitigationUpgrade Suricata to version 7.0.15 or 8.0.4 or later to patch this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SuricataApplication
Affected:< 7.0.15>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Suricata installation and version
    Run 'suricata --version' or 'suricata -V' to display the installed version number
    Affected if Version is below 7.0.15 OR version is 8.0.0, 8.0.1, 8.0.2, or 8.0.3 (these are the affected versions)
  2. Verify HTTP2 protocol detection is enabled
    Inspect the Suricata configuration file (typically /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml) and look for 'http2' under the 'app-layer' protocols section, or check if 'http2' is listed in enabled protocols
    Affected if HTTP2 protocol detection is enabled (the vulnerability only applies when Suricata is parsing HTTP2 traffic)
  3. Confirm Suricata is processing HTTP traffic
    Check active Suricata interfaces and rules by reviewing /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml for 'http' or 'http2' rule classifications, or run 'suricatactl stats' to see if HTTP2 counters are incrementing
    Affected if Suricata is actively processing HTTP2 traffic (the attack requires HTTP2 frames to reach the engine)

You are affected if Suricata version is below 7.0.15 or between 8.0.0 and 8.0.3 AND HTTP2 protocol detection is enabled and processing traffic.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.0.15 / 8.0.4 or later
Fixed in 7.0.158.0.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Suricata to version 7.0.15 or 8.0.4 or later to patch this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

7.0.15 (for 7.x branch) or 8.0.4 (for 8.x branch)

  1. 1. Determine current Suricata version by running 'suricata --version'
  2. 2. If version is < 7.0.15 and on the 7.x branch, plan upgrade to 7.0.15
  3. 3. If version is >= 8.0.0 and < 8.0.4 and on the 8.x branch, plan upgrade to 8.0.4
  4. 4. Backup existing Suricata configuration files (typically in /etc/suricata/)
  5. 5. Upgrade Suricata using your package manager or by compiling from source
  6. 6. Verify the installed version matches the target fixed release (7.0.15 or 8.0.4)
  7. 7. Restart the Suricata service
  8. 8. Monitor for normal operation and verify the memory exhaustion issue is resolved

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Suricata Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31935 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31935 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data