WiresharkApplication

CVE-2026-3203

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.4.14 / 4.6.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
RF4CE Profile protocol dissector crash in Wireshark 4.6.0 to 4.6.3 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.13 allows denial of service

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A crash vulnerability exists in the RF4CE Profile protocol dissector of Wireshark versions 4.6.0-4.6.3 and 4.4.0-4.4.13. The dissector fails to properly handle malformed or malicious RF4CE packets, causing Wireshark to crash when processing such input, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationUpdate Wireshark to version 4.6.4 or later (or the latest 4.4.x version) to obtain the patched dissector. Avoid opening untrusted packet capture files from unknown sources until the update is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WiresharkApplication
Affected:>= 4.4.0, < 4.4.14>= 4.6.0, < 4.6.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Wireshark version
    Run 'wireshark --version' or 'tshark --version' to determine the exact version number
    Affected if Version is 4.4.0 through 4.4.13, or 4.6.0 through 4.6.3 (not 4.4.14+ or 4.6.4+)
  2. Verify RF4CE protocol support
    Open Wireshark, go to Help > About Wireshark > Plugins or check if rf4ce is listed in the supported protocols (packet-rf4ce dissector)
    Affected if The RF4CE Profile protocol dissector is present and enabled in the installation
  3. Identify capture file sources
    Review recent packet capture files opened in Wireshark, especially files from untrusted or unknown sources
    Affected if You have opened or may open pcap/pcapng files containing RF4CE traffic from untrusted sources

You are affected if your Wireshark version falls within 4.4.0-4.4.13 or 4.6.0-4.6.3 AND the RF4CE dissector is enabled and you process capture files that may contain RF4CE traffic.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.4.14 / 4.6.4 or later
Fixed in 4.4.144.6.4
Interim mitigation

Update Wireshark to version 4.6.4 or later (or the latest 4.4.x version) to obtain the patched dissector. Avoid opening untrusted packet capture files from unknown sources until the update is applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to Wireshark 4.4.14 (for 4.4.x users) or Wireshark 4.6.4 (for 4.6.x users)

  1. Identify the currently installed Wireshark version using 'wireshark --version' or 'tshark --version'
  2. If running Wireshark 4.4.0 through 4.4.13, upgrade to version 4.4.14
  3. If running Wireshark 4.6.0 through 4.6.3, upgrade to version 4.6.4
  4. Use the official Wireshark download page (www.wireshark.org) or your system's package manager to obtain the fixed version
  5. Restart Wireshark or any related tools (tshark, dumpcap) after upgrading
  6. Verify the new version is installed correctly
Caveat Minor release upgrades within the same major version typically have no breaking changes; always review release notes for behavioral changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Wireshark Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3203 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data