CVE-2026-32083
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows SSDP Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in the Windows SSDP (Simple Service Discovery Protocol) Service where improper synchronization of shared resources allows a locally authorized attacker to exploit the timing window and elevate privileges to higher permission levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9060< 10.0.17763.8644< 10.0.19044.7184< 10.0.19045.7184< 10.0.22631.6936< 10.0.26100.8246< 10.0.26200.8246< 10.0.28000.1836CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to display the installed Windows version and build number.Affected if The displayed build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.9060, 17763.8644, 19044.7184, 19045.7184, 22631.6936, 26100.8246, 26200.8246, or 28000.1836 depending on your Windows release.
-
Identify Windows release versionRun 'winver' to confirm whether you are on Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, or Windows 11 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, or 26h1.Affected if Your Windows release corresponds to one of the affected versions listed and the build number is below the corresponding threshold.
-
Verify SSDP Service statusOpen Services (services.msc) or run 'Get-Service SSDP' in PowerShell to check if the SSDP Discovery Service is installed and its current state (Running/Stopped).Affected if The SSDP Service is present on the system and is running; however, note that the vulnerability could still apply even if the service is disabled since the race condition exists in the service code itself.
-
Confirm service executable existsCheck if the SSDP service binary exists at the expected path by running 'Get-WmiObject win32_service | Where-Object {$_.Name -eq "SSDP"}' in PowerShell to retrieve service details including the executable path.Affected if The SSDP service is registered on the system.
You are affected if your Windows version and build number match any of the affected release/build combinations AND the SSDP Service is present on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.906010.0.17763.864410.0.19044.7184
Apply the Microsoft security update for this vulnerability through standard Windows patch management processes. Verify the SSDP Service functions normally after patching.
Upgrade to the latest Windows 10 or Windows 11 build that includes the CVE-2026-32083 security patch (minimum build numbers listed in steps)
- Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates
- Ensure the update includes the build number >= to the fixed version for your Windows edition: Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.9060 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8644 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7184 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7184 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.6936 | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8246 | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8246 | Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.1836
- Verify the installed version by running 'winver' command to confirm the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32083 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32083 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data