CVE-2026-32193
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') in Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) allows an authorized attacker to escape restricted directories and execute code locally on affected AKS nodes or infrastructure components.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026-02-13.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check AKS cluster control plane versionRun `az aks show -g <resource-group> -n <cluster-name> --query "kubernetesVersion"` or use Azure Portal to view the AKS cluster properties. Compare the version to 2026-02-13.5.Affected if The AKS cluster version is earlier than 2026-02-13.5 (the version number will be lower, for example 2026-01-15.3 or any version prior to the patch release).
-
Verify AKS cluster provisioning stateRun `az aks show -g <resource-group> -n <cluster-name> --query "provisioningState"` to confirm the cluster is in a Running state.Affected if The cluster exists and is Running, meaning the vulnerable AKS service component is actively handling requests.
-
Check for authenticated user access to AKS management APIsReview Azure RBAC role assignments on the AKS resource using `az role assignment list --scope /subscriptions/<sub-id>/resourceGroups/<rg>/providers/Microsoft.ContainerService/managedClusters/<cluster>` or Azure Portal IAM blade.Affected if Any Azure AD authenticated principal (user, service principal, or managed identity) has at least Reader or higher permissions to the AKS resource, as the vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker.
-
Inspect AKS cluster networking configurationRun `az aks show -g <resource-group> -n <cluster-name> --query "networkProfile"` to check if the API server is exposed via public or private endpoints.Affected if The AKS API server has a public endpoint (enablePublicNetworkAccess: true) or private endpoint configuration that permits authenticated access from outside the cluster.
You are affected if your AKS cluster version is earlier than 2026-02-13.5 AND at least one authenticated Azure AD principal has access to manage or interact with the AKS resource.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026-02-13.5
Apply Microsoft-provided patches by upgrading to fixed AKS versions; review and limit unnecessary permissions for authorized users to reduce attack surface.
2026-02-13.5 (or later)
- Identify the current Kubernetes version of your AKS cluster: `az aks show -g <resource-group-name> -n <cluster-name> --query kubernetesVersion`.
- Check available AKS versions for your region: `az aks get-versions -l <location> --output table`.
- Upgrade the AKS cluster to version 2026-02-13.5 (or a later version) using: `az aks upgrade --resource-group <resource-group-name> --name <cluster-name> --kubernetes-version 2026-02-13.5`.
- Verify the upgrade succeeded by running `az aks show -g <resource-group-name> -n <cluster-name> --query kubernetesVersion` and confirming the version is 2026-02-13.5 or later.
- Validate that all workloads and node pools are running correctly and review the AKS release notes for any known issues or required post‑upgrade actions.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32193 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32193 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data