CVE-2026-32340
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in raratheme Business One Page business-one-page allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Business One Page: from n/a through <= 1.3.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in the Business One Page WordPress theme allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This likely means certain administrative or privileged functions lack proper capability checks or permission validation, permitting unauthorized users to access restricted functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Business One Page theme is installedNavigate to Appearance > Themes in WordPress admin dashboard and confirm 'Business One Page' theme is active, or check wp-content/themes/ directory for the theme folderAffected if The Business One Page theme is active on the WordPress site
-
Determine the installed theme versionCheck the style.css file in the theme directory (wp-content/themes/business-one-page/) for the 'Version:' header comment, or view theme details in Appearance > ThemesAffected if Unable to verify the theme version or version is unknown
-
Identify theme AJAX endpoints without capability checksSearch theme PHP files (especially functions.php, includes/*.php) for add_action('wp_ajax_...) calls and examine if they include current_user_can() or similar capability checks before executing sensitive operationsAffected if AJAX handlers exist that perform admin-level or privileged operations without verifying user capabilities
-
Check for unprotected admin-page functionsReview theme files for direct calls to admin-only functions or rendering of admin-style pages (options pages, settings panels) and verify they include current_user_can() or admin verification checksAffected if Theme provides admin-facing functionality (settings, options, content management) accessible without proper capability verification
-
Test for unauthorized access to privileged operationsUse a low-privilege or unauthenticated user account to attempt access to theme-related functions (such as updating options, modifying content, accessing admin URLs), or inspect HTTP responses when accessing theme admin pages without proper authenticationAffected if Low-privilege or unauthenticated users can successfully access or execute functions that should require administrator capabilities
The site is affected if the Business One Page theme is active and contains administrative or privileged functions accessible without proper capability checks or permission validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks (capability checks, nonce verification, role-based access control) on all sensitive functionality, and conduct access control review across the theme.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32340 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32340 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data