dbcve.org
Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2026-32390

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in linethemes Nanosoft nanosoft allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Nanosoft: from n/a through < 1.3.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Nanosoft (versions before 1.3.2) allows exploitation of incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized users to access protected functionality.

MitigationReview and properly configure access control policies for all sensitive endpoints, implement proper authorization checks, and upgrade to version 1.3.2 or later if a patch is available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Nanosoft version
    Locate the installed Nanosoft version by checking the application metadata, about screen, or version file typically found in the installation directory or application binary information.
    Affected if Installed version is before 1.3.2
  2. Review access control security level configuration
    Locate and inspect the access control or security level configuration file(s) in the Nanosoft installation. These are typically found in config, settings, or security-related configuration files within the application directory.
    Affected if Security levels are set to a level that permits access without proper authorization checks, or if authorization enforcement is disabled or misconfigured
  3. Verify protected endpoint authorization
    Test or inspect sensitive endpoints and protected functionality to determine if authorization checks are properly enforced. Review the access control policy configuration for sensitive operations.
    Affected if Protected functionality can be accessed by unauthorized users due to missing or improperly configured authorization checks on security-sensitive endpoints

A user is affected if Nanosoft is installed with a version before 1.3.2 and has access control security levels configured in a way that fails to properly enforce authorization on protected functionality.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and properly configure access control policies for all sensitive endpoints, implement proper authorization checks, and upgrade to version 1.3.2 or later if a patch is available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32390 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32390 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data