CVE-2026-32455
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in RealMag777 MDTF wp-meta-data-filter-and-taxonomy-filter allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects MDTF: from n/a through <= 1.3.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDOM-based XSS vulnerability in the MDTF (wp-meta-data-filter-and-taxonomy-filter) WordPress plugin allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through unsanitized user input that gets executed in victims' browsers due to improper neutralization during web page generation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify MDTF plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'MDTF - wp-meta-data-filter-and-taxonomy-filter' or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder containing 'meta-data-filter' in the nameAffected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Identify installed MDTF versionIn WordPress admin Plugins list, find MDTF and note the version number displayed, or inspect the main plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/<mdtf-folder>/index.php for the 'Version' tagAffected if Version is at or below the last known vulnerable version (any unpatched version)
-
Confirm frontend filter functionality is in useCheck if any WordPress pages or posts contain the MDTF shortcode [mdtf_filter] or if the plugin's widget is actively used on the siteAffected if The filter shortcode or widget is present and accessible to users
-
Inspect page source for unsanitized parametersLoad a page with MDTF filters active, view the browser page source, and look for GET/POST parameters (such as mdtf_[...] values) appearing directly in HTML without proper escapingAffected if User-supplied filter values appear unescaped in the rendered HTML
User is affected if the MDTF plugin is installed, active, and running an unpatched version with the filter functionality exposed on the site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of the MDTF plugin when available, or implement proper output encoding and input validation in the plugin's JavaScript to neutralize malicious payloads.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32455 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32455 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data