Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-3251

MEDIUM · 6.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Webremium Istanbul Web Design Mezunum Satiyorum allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mezunum Satiyorum: from 1.2.504 through 10072026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A Stored XSS vulnerability exists in the Mezunum Satiyorum component of Webremium Istanbul Web Design. User-supplied input is stored on the server and rendered in web pages without proper sanitization or output encoding, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the browsers of other users who view the affected content.

MitigationImplement context-aware output encoding/escaping for all user-supplied data before rendering in HTML, combined with input validation at entry points. Additionally, deploy Content-Security-Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Webremium installation and Mezunum Satiyorum component
    Inspect the web application file structure for the Mezunum Satiyorum component. Check the application's component manifest, modules directory, or source code for references to this component.
    Affected if The Mezunum Satiyorum component is present in the Webremium installation.
  2. Determine the installed version of the affected component
    Locate version information in the component's metadata files, such as composer.json, package.json, a README file, or the component's main PHP/Python file. Compare this version to any publicly disclosed version information.
    Affected if A version number is found that matches or precedes the vulnerable version range (if published).
  3. Verify user input storage functionality exists
    Locate the code paths where the Mezunum Satiyorum component accepts and stores user-supplied data. Check for database insertion operations or storage mechanisms that persist user input.
    Affected if The component stores user-generated content in a database or file system.
  4. Inspect output rendering for stored data
    Find the code that retrieves and displays stored user data in the Mezunum Satiyorum pages. Examine how the data is included in HTML responses - look for whether output encoding functions are used.
    Affected if Stored user data is rendered in HTML pages without visible evidence of sanitization or encoding functions (such as htmlspecialchars, htmlentities, or equivalent).
  5. Check for input validation on stored content
    Review the data entry points where user input is accepted for storage. Look for validation routines that filter or reject script tags, event handlers, or other XSS vectors before storage.
    Affected if No input validation is performed on user-supplied content before storage, or validation can be bypassed.

If the Mezunum Satiyorum component is present and user-supplied content can be stored and displayed without proper sanitization or output encoding, the environment is affected by this Stored XSS vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement context-aware output encoding/escaping for all user-supplied data before rendering in HTML, combined with input validation at entry points. Additionally, deploy Content-Security-Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3251 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3251 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data