InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2026-32616

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
89/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Pigeon is a message board/notepad/social system/blog. Prior to 1.0.201, the application uses $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] without validation to construct email verification URLs in the register and resendmail flows. An attacker can manipulate the Host header in the HTTP request, causing the verification link sent to the user's email to point to an attacker-controlled domain. This can lead to account takeover by stealing the email verification token. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.201.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Pigeon application uses $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] directly without validation to construct email verification URLs in the register and resendmail flows. An attacker can manipulate the HTTP Host header to inject an attacker-controlled domain into verification links, allowing them to intercept verification tokens and achieve account takeover.

MitigationUpgrade to version 1.201 or later. Alternatively, implement strict validation of the HTTP_HOST header against an allowlist of trusted domains before using it in URL construction.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Pigeon application installation
    Search for files named 'pigeon.php' or directories containing 'Pigeon' in your web root, or check your application framework's base directory for the Pigeon application code
    Affected if Pigeon application is present on the server
  2. Check Pigeon version
    Locate the main Pigeon application file (typically index.php, config.php, or a VERSION file) and read the defined version constant or variable
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 1.201
  3. Examine register flow code for HTTP_HOST usage
    Search the codebase for files handling registration (commonly 'register.php', 'RegisterController.php', or similar) and inspect lines using $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] without sanitization
    Affected if $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] is used directly in URL construction without validation or allowlist checks
  4. Examine resendmail flow code for HTTP_HOST usage
    Search the codebase for files handling email resend (commonly 'resendmail.php', 'ResendController.php', or similar) and inspect lines using $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] without sanitization
    Affected if $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] is used directly in URL construction without validation or allowlist checks
  5. Verify Host header validation exists
    Search the application for HTTP_HOST validation logic using keywords like 'allowed_hosts', 'valid_host', 'whitelist', or 'filter_var' with FILTER_VALIDATE_URL
    Affected if No validation or allowlist logic is found for HTTP_HOST before constructing URLs

A system is affected if the Pigeon version is below 1.201 AND the register or resendmail flows use $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] directly in URL construction without any validation or allowlist filtering.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to version 1.201 or later. Alternatively, implement strict validation of the HTTP_HOST header against an allowlist of trusted domains before using it in URL construction.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

1.0.201

  1. 1. Identify the currently running Pigeon version by checking the application configuration or version file
  2. 2. Backup the current application database and files before performing the upgrade
  3. 3. Download Pigeon version 1.0.201 from the official GitHub repository
  4. 4. Replace the existing application files with the new version 1.0.201 files
  5. 5. Verify that the application correctly validates the Host header in email verification URLs by testing the register and resendmail flows
  6. 6. Confirm that email verification links now use a validated, trusted domain rather than the attacker-controlled Host header value

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32616 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32616 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data