Crosschex StandardApplication · Anviz

CVE-2026-32650

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Anviz CrossChex Standard is vulnerable when an attacker manipulates the TDS7 PreLogin to disable encryption, causing database credentials to be sent in plaintext and enabling unauthorized database access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Anviz CrossChex Standard has a vulnerability where attackers can manipulate the TDS7 PreLogin negotiation packet to force encryption to be disabled. This causes database authentication credentials to be transmitted in plaintext, allowing attackers to intercept credentials and gain unauthorized access to the connected database.

MitigationOrganizations should implement network segmentation to limit exposure of database traffic, deploy TLS/SSL inspection at the network perimeter to detect encryption downgrade attempts, and contact Anviz for an official patch that enforces encryption during TDS7 PreLogin negotiation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Crosschex StandardApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm CrossChex Standard installation
    Check for the Anviz CrossChex Standard application in your system programs or installation directory. Look for the executable (typically named CrossChex.exe or similar) in the program's installation folder.
    Affected if The application is present on the system, as all versions are affected by this vulnerability.
  2. Identify database connectivity configuration
    Locate the database configuration file or settings panel within CrossChex Standard. This is typically found in the application settings, configuration files within the installation directory, or in the system registry where the application stores its database connection strings.
    Affected if CrossChex Standard is configured to connect to any database (SQL Server or similar using TDS protocol), making it vulnerable to TDS7 PreLogin negotiation manipulation.
  3. Inspect TDS PreLogin negotiation traffic
    Use a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark) to capture traffic on the port used by the database (typically port 1433 for SQL Server). Analyze the TDS7 PreLogin packet to determine if the encryption option is being set to OFF or can be manipulated by an attacker.
    Affected if The TDS PreLogin response shows encryption is disabled or set to not required, meaning credentials could be transmitted in plaintext.
  4. Verify encryption settings in database connection
    Review the CrossChex database connection settings or configuration files for any encryption-related parameters. Check if 'Encrypt' or 'TrustServerCertificate' settings are properly configured.
    Affected if Encryption is not explicitly enforced in the connection settings, leaving the connection vulnerable to encryption downgrade.

If Anviz CrossChex Standard is installed and connected to a database without enforced encryption in the TDS7 PreLogin negotiation, the system is affected and credentials may be transmitted in plaintext.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Organizations should implement network segmentation to limit exposure of database traffic, deploy TLS/SSL inspection at the network perimeter to detect encryption downgrade attempts, and contact Anviz for an official patch that enforces encryption during TDS7 PreLogin negotiation.

Fix this in Crosschex Standard Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32650 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32650 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data