CVE-2026-32673
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in BIG-IP scripted monitors that may allow an authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role to execute arbitrary system commands with higher privileges. In appliance mode deployments, a successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in BIG-IP scripted monitors where an authenticated attacker with Resource Administrator or Administrator role can execute arbitrary system commands with elevated privileges. In appliance mode deployments, successful exploitation allows crossing security boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the web UI under Dashboard > General Properties to obtain the installed versionAffected if The version falls within 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, 16.1.0-16.1.6, or equals 21.0.0
-
Determine if scripted monitors existReview monitor configurations via 'tmsh list ltm monitor' or the web UI under Local Traffic > Monitors to identify any monitors of type 'script'Affected if Any scripted monitors are configured and enabled on the system
-
Check for privileged administrative accountsReview user roles using 'tmsh list auth user' or via the web UI under User Management > User List to identify accounts with Resource Administrator or Administrator rolesAffected if Accounts with Resource Administrator or Administrator privileges exist on the system
You are affected if your BIG-IP version matches the affected ranges AND scripted monitors are configured AND privileged administrative accounts exist on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict administrative access to least privilege principles and apply F5 security patches when available. Monitor and audit administrative actions on BIG-IP systems.
Upgrade to BIG-IP version 17.1.4 or later (17.1.x line), 17.5.2 or later (17.5.x line), 16.1.7 or later (16.1.x line), or the next available stable release beyond 21.0.0 - choose the appropriate branch matching your current deployment
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or checking the web UI (System > Software > Image/List)
- 2. Determine which BIG-IP module(s) are affected by checking the installed modules: 'tmsh list sys module'
- 3. Download the fixed version from F5 downloads (login required): go to https://my.f5.com/manage/downloads/ and search for the appropriate version >= 17.1.4, >= 17.5.2, >= 16.1.7, or a version beyond 21.0.0
- 4. Verify the upgrade does not conflict with existing BIG-IP infrastructure compatibility requirements
- 5. Create a backup of the BIG-IP configuration: 'tmsh save sys config'
- 6. Upload the ISO image to the BIG-IP via web UI (System > Software > Upload) or SCP
- 7. Install the new version: 'tmsh install sys software volume <volume-name> <image-file>'
- 8. Reboot into the new volume: 'tmsh reboot volume <volume-name>'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32673 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32673 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data