CVE-2026-32840
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEdimax GS-5008PL firmware version 1.00.54 and prior contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the system_name_set.cgi script that allows attackers to inject arbitrary script code by manipulating the sysName parameter. Attackers can send a crafted POST request with malicious script payload that executes when management pages including system_data.js are viewed by administrators.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Edimax GS-5008PL firmware (version 1.00.54 and prior) allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via the sysName parameter in the system_name_set.cgi script. The malicious payload persists and executes when administrators view management pages that include system_data.js.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.00.54CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the Edimax GS-5008PL web management interface and check the firmware version in System > Firmware Upgrade or System Information page. Alternatively, check via SNMP or console using 'show version' or similar command.Affected if Firmware version is 1.00.54 or lower
-
Locate the system_name_set.cgi scriptCheck if the web management interface responds to /cgi-bin/system_name_set.cgi or similar path. This is the endpoint that processes the sysName parameter.Affected if The CGI script is accessible and accepts sysName parameter without authentication bypass checks
-
Inspect system_data.js for unsanitized outputAccess the management page that includes system_data.js (typically under System > General or System Information). View the page source and search for the sysName value being inserted into JavaScript context without proper encoding.Affected if The sysName value appears in the HTML/JavaScript response without HTML entity encoding (e.g., <script> appears as literal text rather than being encoded)
-
Verify stored XSS persistenceSubmit a test payload via the sysName parameter in system_name_set.cgi (such as a benign alert or image tag). Then navigate away and return to any management page that loads system_data.js to see if the payload executes or renders.Affected if The injected payload persists and renders/executes when viewing management pages
You are affected if the Edimax GS-5008PL is running firmware version 1.00.54 or prior and the management interface displays the sysName value without encoding in system_data.js-loaded pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor firmware update if available; otherwise implement server-side input validation and output encoding on the sysName parameter to neutralize script injection.
Latest firmware version available on Edimax website (newer than 1.00.54)
- 1. Visit the official Edimax support website at www.edimax.com to check for available firmware updates.
- 2. Locate the GS-5008PL product page and navigate to the Downloads/Support section.
- 3. Download the latest available firmware version for the GS-5008PL switch.
- 4. Access the device web management interface and navigate to the firmware upgrade section.
- 5. Upload and apply the new firmware following the on-screen instructions.
- 6. After the upgrade completes, verify the system_name_set.cgi functionality works correctly and confirm the sysName parameter is now properly sanitized.
- 7. Clear browser cache and test that previously stored XSS payloads in sysName no longer execute.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32840 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32840 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data