CVE-2026-32976
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.3.11 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability allowing channel commands to mutate protected sibling-account configuration despite configWrites restrictions. Attackers with authorized access on one account can execute channel commands like /config set channels.<provider>.accounts.<id> to modify configuration on target accounts with configWrites: false.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenClaw before 2026.3.11 contains an authorization bypass where channel commands can modify protected sibling-account configuration despite configWrites restrictions. Attackers with authorized access on one account can execute /config set commands on channels.<provider>.accounts.<id> to modify configuration on target accounts that should have configWrites: false.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.3.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed OpenClaw versionRun 'openclaw --version' or check the application binary/package metadata to determine the exact version numberAffected if Version is before 2026.3.11 (e.g., 2026.3.10, 2026.3.0, or any earlier release)
-
Identify accounts with configWrites restrictionsExamine the OpenClaw configuration files (typically in config/ or ~/.openclaw/) and search for accounts where configWrites is explicitly set to falseAffected if Any account in the configuration has configWrites: false set, creating a protected sibling account
-
Verify presence of sibling accountsReview the configuration for multiple accounts under the channels.<provider>.accounts section, noting any account IDs that differ from the one being usedAffected if Multiple accounts exist under the same provider (e.g., channels.discord.accounts) where at least one has configWrites: false and others exist as siblings
-
Test command access control (if safe to do in non-production)Using an account with channel command access, attempt to issue a /config set channels.<provider>.accounts.<sibling_id> command targeting a sibling account with configWrites: falseAffected if The command executes successfully without authorization denial, indicating the bypass is present
Your environment is affected if you run OpenClaw version < 2026.3.11 AND have any account configured with configWrites: false alongside sibling accounts, as the authorization bypass allows modification of protected account configurations via channel commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.3.11
Update to OpenClaw 2026.3.11 or later to patch the authorization bypass. Review and audit existing channel command permissions and account configurations for any unauthorized changes.
2026.3.11 or later
- Identify all OpenClaw instances running versions before 2026.3.11
- Take a backup of current configuration data
- Plan and schedule maintenance window for upgrade
- Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.3.11 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
- Test that accounts with configWrites: false can no longer be modified via channel commands from sibling accounts
- Confirm normal functionality of authorized configuration changes still works
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32976 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32976 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data