CVE-2026-32987
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenClaw before 2026.3.13 allows bootstrap setup codes to be replayed during device pairing verification in src/infra/device-bootstrap.ts. Attackers can verify a valid bootstrap code multiple times before approval to escalate pending pairing scopes, including privilege escalation to operator.admin.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpenClaw before version 2026.3.13 contains a replay attack vulnerability in the device bootstrap process (src/infra/device-bootstrap.ts). The system fails to invalidate bootstrap codes after initial verification, allowing attackers to replay valid codes multiple times during the pairing approval window. This enables escalation of pending pairing scopes, ultimately allowing privilege escalation to operator.admin level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.3.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check OpenClaw versionRun 'openclaw --version' or check the package.json/version file to determine the installed versionAffected if The installed version is before 2026.3.13 (e.g., 2026.3.12, 2026.2.0, etc.)
-
Verify device pairing feature is enabledInspect the system configuration for device bootstrap/pairing module status in config files or runtime settingsAffected if Device pairing or bootstrap functionality is enabled and accessible to users
-
Examine bootstrap code handlingReview logs or debug output during the device pairing process to see if bootstrap codes are validated only once or can be reusedAffected if Bootstrap codes remain valid after initial verification and can be replayed within the pairing approval window
-
Check for replay protection in bootstrap moduleInspect src/infra/device-bootstrap.ts or equivalent runtime configuration to verify if nonce, timestamp, or one-time-use validation is implementedAffected if No cryptographic replay protection (nonces, timestamps) or code invalidation after first use is found in the bootstrap verification logic
-
Audit pairing scope escalation logsSearch system logs for events where pending pairing scopes were escalated to operator.admin level during the pairing windowAffected if Multiple bootstrap code submissions result in elevated privileges without additional verification
You are affected if OpenClaw version is before 2026.3.13 AND device pairing/bootstrap is enabled, with no replay protection preventing reuse of bootstrap codes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.3.13
Implement cryptographic replay protection in the bootstrap verification process using one-time-use nonces or timestamp-based validation to ensure each bootstrap code can only be used once. Additionally, invalidate bootstrap codes immediately after successful verification to prevent multiple replays.
2026.3.13
- 1. Identify the current OpenClaw version in use by checking package.json or the running application
- 2. Review the release notes for version 2026.3.13 to understand the security fix for the replay attack vulnerability (CWE-294)
- 3. Update the OpenClaw dependency to version 2026.3.13 or later in your package manager (e.g., npm install [email protected] or yarn upgrade [email protected])
- 4. Rebuild and redeploy the application with the updated version
- 5. Verify the fix is applied by confirming src/infra/device-bootstrap.ts contains the commit 1803d16d5cec970c54b0e1ac46b31b1cbade335c changes which prevent bootstrap code replay during device pairing
- 6. Test the device pairing workflow to ensure legitimate bootstrap codes work correctly and cannot be replayed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32987 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32987 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data