CVE-2026-32994
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe /api/v1/autotranslate.translateMessage endpoint in versions <8.5.0, <8.4.2, <8.3.4, <8.2.4, <8.1.5, <8.0.6, <7.13.8, and <7.10.12 allows any authenticated user to retrieve the full content of any message from any room (private groups, direct messages, channels) by simply providing the target message ID. The endpoint fetches the message via Messages.findOneById(messageId) with no room access check (canAccessRoomIdAsync is never called), returning the complete IMessage object including message text, sender info, room ID, timestamps, and markdown content.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe /api/v1/autotranslate.translateMessage endpoint in Rocket.Chat lacks room access validation, allowing any authenticated user to retrieve the full content of any message by providing its ID. The endpoint calls Messages.findOneById() without checking canAccessRoomIdAsync, exposing private messages, direct messages, and channel messages to unauthorized users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Rocket.Chat versionLocate the version file or check the admin panel at /admin/info, or query the API endpoint /api/v1/infoAffected if Version is earlier than 8.5.0, 8.4.2, 8.3.4, 8.2.4, 8.1.5, 8.0.6, 7.13.8, or 7.10.12 (any version before the fixes)
-
Verify autotranslate module is enabledNavigate to Administration > Settings > AutoTranslate (or equivalent) in the Rocket.Chat admin panel, or inspect the configuration database for autotranslate settingsAffected if The autotranslate feature is enabled and the version is vulnerable
-
Confirm user is logged in with standard user accountLog into Rocket.Chat with any regular user account (non-admin, no special room permissions)Affected if You have valid credentials for any user account in the system
-
Test the vulnerable API endpoint with a cross-room message IDSend a POST request to /api/v1/autotranslate.translateMessage with a message ID from a room the authenticated user is NOT a member of. Include a valid auth token. Example: {"messageId":"<any-message-id>","targetLanguage":"en"}Affected if The API returns full message content (including sender, room ID, timestamps) for a message the user should not have access to, indicating the IDOR is present
You are affected if your Rocket.Chat version is before the fixed versions AND the autotranslate module is enabled, allowing any authenticated user to retrieve messages from rooms they do not belong to.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper room access verification by calling canAccessRoomIdAsync (or equivalent authorization check) before returning message content to ensure users can only access messages from rooms they are authorized to view.
Upgrade to Rocket.Chat 8.5.0 or later (for 8.x users), or 7.13.8/7.10.12 or later (for 7.x users)
- 1. Identify your current Rocket.Chat version by checking the admin panel or running `rocketctl version`
- 2. Determine which major version branch you are on (8.x or 7.x) to select the appropriate upgrade target
- 3. For 8.x users: Upgrade to version 8.5.0 or later
- 4. For 7.x users: Upgrade to version 7.13.8 or later if on 7.13 branch, or 7.10.12 or later if on 7.10 branch
- 5. Review the changelog/release notes for your target version to confirm the security fix is included
- 6. Perform a backup of your database before upgrading
- 7. Test the upgrade in a staging environment first
- 8. Apply the upgrade following standard Rocket.Chat upgrade procedures
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32994 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32994 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data