CVE-2026-33057
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMesop is a Python-based UI framework that allows users to build web applications. In versions 1.2.2 and below, an explicit web endpoint inside the ai/ testing module infrastructure directly ingests untrusted Python code strings unconditionally without authentication measures, yielding standard Unrestricted Remote Code Execution. Any individual capable of routing HTTP logic to this server block will gain explicit host-machine command rights. The AI codebase package includes a lightweight debugging Flask server inside ai/sandbox/wsgi_app.py. The /exec-py route accepts base_64 encoded raw string payloads inside the code parameter natively evaluated by a basic POST web request. It saves it rapidly to the operating system logic path and injects it recursively using execute_module(module_path...). This issue has been fixed in version 1.2.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMesop versions 1.2.2 and below contain an unrestricted remote code execution vulnerability in the ai/sandbox/wsgi_app.py testing module. The /exec-py endpoint accepts base64-encoded Python code via the code parameter in POST requests and unconditionally evaluates it using execute_module() without any authentication, allowing any attacker with network access to execute arbitrary commands on the host machine.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Mesop versionRun `pip show mesop` or `python -c "import mesop; print(mesop.__version__)"` to determine the installed versionAffected if Version is 1.2.2 or lower (less than 1.2.3)
-
Locate the ai/sandbox moduleSearch for the file ai/sandbox/wsgi_app.py in the Mesop installation directory using `python -c "import mesop; print(mesop.__file__)"` to find the base path, then check for the sandbox moduleAffected if The file ai/sandbox/wsgi_app.py exists in the Mesop installation
-
Verify if the /exec-py endpoint is registeredInspect the wsgi_app.py source code to confirm the /exec-py route is defined and check if the execute_module() function is called without authentication checksAffected if The /exec-py endpoint exists and lacks authentication logic
-
Test endpoint accessibility (if running)If Mesop is running, send a POST request to /exec-py with a base64-encoded code parameter (e.g., code=ZXhlYygncHJpbnQoJzEyMycp'))Affected if The endpoint responds and accepts code execution without requiring credentials
You are affected if running Mesop version below 1.2.3 with the ai/sandbox/wsgi_app.py module present and the /exec-py endpoint accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.2.3
Immediately upgrade Mesop to version 1.2.3 or later. Additionally, ensure the ai/sandbox debugging module is not exposed in production environments and audit systems for signs of compromise, as this vulnerability grants full command execution capabilities.
Mesop >= 1.2.3
- Upgrade Mesop to version 1.2.3 or later by running: pip install mesop>=1.2.3
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running: pip show mesop and checking the version number
- Ensure any services running the vulnerable Mesop version are restarted to load the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33057 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33057 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data