JexactylApplication

CVE-2026-33061

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.8.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Public exploit Remotely reachable Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jexactyl is a customisable game management panel and billing system. Commits after 025e8dbb0daaa04054276bda814d922cf4af58da and before e28edb204e80efab628d1241198ea4f079779cfd inject server-side objects into client-side JavaScript through resources/views/templates/wrapper.blade.php. Using unescaped {!! json_encode(...) !!} without safe encoding flags allows string values to break out of the JavaScript context and be interpreted as HTML/JS by the browser. If any serialized fields contain attacker-controlled content, such as a username, display name, or site config value, a malicious payload will execute arbitrary script for any user viewing the page (stored DOM XSS). This issue has been patched by commit e28edb204e80efab628d1241198ea4f079779cfd.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis
How this class of weakness works · CWE-79

Untrusted input is placed into a web page without being neutralised, so an attacker's markup or script executes in another user's browser. That can hijack sessions, capture keystrokes, or silently perform actions as the victim. Fixing it properly means context-aware output encoding everywhere data meets HTML, backed by a content-security policy as a second line of defence.

General guidance for the cross-site scripting (xss) class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JexactylApplication
Affected:<= 3.8.0= 4.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.8.0
Vendor patch github.com →
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to Jexactyl version 4.0.1 or later (the first release containing commit e28edb204e80efab628d1241198ea4f079779cfd)

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of Jexactyl by checking the application or git tags
  2. 2. Check the Jexactyl releases page or git tags for versions newer than 4.0.0 that include the fix commit e28edb204e80efab628d1241198ea4f079779cfd
  3. 3. If a newer stable release (e.g., 4.0.1 or later) is available, upgrade to that version following the official upgrade documentation
  4. 4. If no newer release is available, manually apply the fix by cherry-picking or merging commit e28edb204e80efab628d1241198ea4f079779cfd into your local repository
  5. 5. After applying the upgrade or patch, clear any application caches and verify the fix by reviewing the changes in resources/views/templates/wrapper.blade.php to ensure json_encode now uses proper encoding flags
Caveat Check Jexactyl release notes for any breaking changes between 4.0.0 and the target upgrade version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can identify the exact fixed release, upgrade, and verify it in staging — typical engagement from $900. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33061 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data