CVE-2026-33247
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNATS-Server is a High-Performance server for NATS.io, a cloud and edge native messaging system. Prior to versions 2.11.15 and 2.12.6, if a nats-server is run with static credentials for all clients provided via argv (the command-line), then those credentials are visible to any user who can see the monitoring port, if that too is enabled. The `/debug/vars` end-point contains an unredacted copy of argv. Versions 2.11.15 and 2.12.6 contain a fix. As a workaround, configure credentials inside a configuration file instead of via argv, and do not enable the monitoring port if using secrets in argv. Best practice remains to not expose the monitoring port to the Internet, or to untrusted network sources.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn NATS-Server versions prior to 2.11.15 and 2.12.6, static credentials passed via command-line arguments (argv) are exposed in plain text through the /debug/vars monitoring endpoint. Any user with access to the monitoring port can retrieve unredacted argv data, including sensitive authentication credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.11.15>= 2.12.0, < 2.12.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NATS Server versionRun 'nats-server --version' or check the binary version. Compare against the affected ranges: < 2.11.15 or >= 2.12.0 and < 2.12.6Affected if The installed version falls within the vulnerable ranges (< 2.11.15 or >= 2.12.0, < 2.12.6)
-
Check for credentials in command-line argumentsReview the process startup script or command used to launch nats-server. Look for --creds, --auth, --user, --password, or similar credential-related flags passed directly in argvAffected if Credentials are passed as command-line arguments to the nats-server process
-
Verify monitoring endpoint is enabledCheck the NATS Server configuration for 'monitor_port' or 'http' settings, and confirm the server is listening on that portAffected if The monitoring endpoint is enabled and accessible on a network port
-
Confirm credential exposure via /debug/varsMake an HTTP request to http://<monitoring_host>:<monitoring_port>/debug/vars and inspect the response for unredacted credential strings that were passed via command lineAffected if Plain-text credentials appear in the /debug/vars output
You are affected if running a vulnerable version AND credentials were passed via command-line arguments AND the monitoring endpoint is accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.11.152.12.6
Upgrade to NATS-Server version 2.11.15 or 2.12.6, or migrate credentials from command-line arguments to a configuration file. Additionally, restrict access to the monitoring port to trusted networks only.
2.11.15 or 2.12.6 (or their respective latest patch releases)
- Identify current NATS Server version by running `nats-server --version`
- If running 2.11.x branch: Upgrade to version 2.11.15 or later (e.g., 2.11.15, 2.11.16, etc.)
- If running 2.12.x branch: Upgrade to version 2.12.6 or later (e.g., 2.12.6, 2.12.7, etc.)
- After upgrade, verify the fix by checking that /debug/vars endpoint no longer exposes command-line credentials
- As a defense-in-depth measure, ensure the monitoring port is not exposed to untrusted networks
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33247 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33247 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data