CVE-2026-33411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDiscourse is an open-source discussion platform. Versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 have a potential stored XSS in topic titles for the solved posts stream. Versions 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a patch. As a workaround, ensure that the Content Security Policy is enabled, and has not been modified in a way which would make it more vulnerable to XSS attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDiscourse versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and 2026.1.2 contain a stored XSS vulnerability in topic titles rendered within the solved posts stream feature. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript through topic titles that persists in the database and executes when users view the solved posts stream.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2026.1.0, < 2026.1.2>= 2026.2.0, < 2026.2.1= 2026.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Discourse versionAccess the Rails console or admin panel and run `Discourse::VERSION::STRING` or navigate to /admin/upgrade to view the installed versionAffected if The installed version is 2026.1.0 through 2026.1.1, 2026.2.0 through 2026.2.0, or exactly 2026.3.0
-
Verify solved plugin is enabledNavigate to Admin > Plugins or check the plugins directory for the 'discourse-solved' plugin being activeAffected if The solved plugin is enabled and running an affected version from step 1
-
Inspect topic titles in the databaseQuery the database: `SELECT id, title FROM topics WHERE title LIKE '%<script%' OR title LIKE '%onerror=%' OR title LIKE '%javascript:%' OR title LIKE '%<img%' OR title LIKE '%onload=%';` or examine recent topics for suspicious title patternsAffected if Any topic titles contain unescaped HTML/JavaScript payloads such as script tags, event handlers, or javascript: URIs
-
Review the solved posts stream outputNavigate to a user's solved posts stream or the /solved endpoint and view page source to verify topic titles are properly escapedAffected if Topic titles in the solved posts stream render raw HTML instead of escaped text
-
Check Content Security PolicyReview the Discourse site settings for content_security_policy enabled status and review HTTP headers on responses from solved posts stream pagesAffected if CSP is disabled and affected version is installed, increasing exploitability
If the installed Discourse version falls within 2026.1.0-2026.1.11, 2026.2.0-2026.2.0, or 2026.3.0 AND the solved plugin is active, the environment is likely affected by this stored XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.1.22026.2.1
Upgrade to version 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, or 2026.1.2. As a workaround, ensure Content Security Policy is enabled and properly configured to mitigate XSS risks.
2026.1.2 (for 2026.1.x users), 2026.2.1 (for 2026.2.x users), or 2026.3.0-latest.1 (for 2026.3.x users)
- 1. Identify your current Discourse version by checking the admin panel or running `git log` in your installation directory
- 2. Based on your current version branch, upgrade to the appropriate fixed release:
- - If on 2026.1.x branch: upgrade to 2026.1.2
- - If on 2026.2.x branch: upgrade to 2026.2.1
- - If on 2026.3.x branch: upgrade to 2026.3.0-latest.1
- 3. Follow standard Discourse upgrade procedures for your deployment method (Docker, source, or package manager)
- 4. After upgrade, verify the installation by checking the version in the admin panel
- 5. Alternatively, as a configuration workaround if immediate upgrade is not possible: ensure Content Security Policy (CSP) is enabled in your Discourse configuration and has not been modified to allow unsafe-inline scripts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data