Langflow DesktopApplication · Langflow

CVE-2026-3345

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.8.4 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Langflow Desktop <=1.8.4 Langflow could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Langflow Desktop <=1.8.4 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows remote attackers to use '../' directory sequences in URLs to access files outside the web root directory, potentially exposing sensitive system files.

MitigationUpgrade to a version newer than 1.8.4. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement input validation to reject URLs containing '../' sequences and apply least-privilege file system permissions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Langflow DesktopApplication
Affected:<= 1.8.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Langflow Desktop version
    Check the application version through its built-in about page, help menu, or by running the application with a version flag if available in the command-line interface
    Affected if The installed version is 1.8.4 or any earlier version of Langflow Desktop
  2. Confirm the web server component is running
    Verify that Langflow Desktop's embedded web server is active by checking for the application listening on its default HTTP port (typically 7860 or 8080) using netstat or similar network utilities
    Affected if The web interface is accessible and the application is serving HTTP requests
  3. Check network exposure of the web interface
    Determine if the Langflow Desktop web interface is bound to all network interfaces (0.0.0.0) or is externally accessible, which would allow remote attackers to exploit the path traversal
    Affected if The web interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet

You are affected if Langflow Desktop version 1.8.4 or earlier is installed and its web interface is running and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.8.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a version newer than 1.8.4. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement input validation to reject URLs containing '../' sequences and apply least-privilege file system permissions.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

A version of Langflow Desktop newer than 1.8.4 (contact IBM for specific fixed release number)

  1. 1. Check IBM's official security advisory pages (www.ibm.com) for the most current information on this vulnerability and available fixes
  2. 2. Identify the latest stable version of Langflow Desktop that is newer than 1.8.4
  3. 3. Backup any existing Langflow configurations and data
  4. 4. Uninstall the current version of Langflow Desktop (<=1.8.4)
  5. 5. Download the updated Langflow Desktop version from IBM's official distribution channels
  6. 6. Install the new version following IBM's installation documentation
  7. 7. Restore configurations from the backup
  8. 8. Verify the application functions correctly with the new version
Caveat Review IBM's release notes for the new version to check for any breaking changes or migration requirements

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Langflow Desktop Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-3345 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-3345 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data