CVE-2026-33459
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user with access to the automatic import feature can submit specially crafted requests with excessively large input values. When multiple such requests are sent concurrently, the backend services become unstable, resulting in service disruption and deployment unavailability for all users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Kibana's automatic import feature allows authenticated users to submit specially crafted requests with excessively large input values. When multiple concurrent requests are sent, backend services become unstable due to resource exhaustion, causing denial of service for all users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.15.0, < 8.19.14>= 9.0.0, < 9.2.8>= 9.3.0, < 9.3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Kibana versionRun `kibana --version` or check the version field in the Kibana status API response (GET /api/status). Compare the installed version against the affected ranges: >= 8.15.0 and < 8.19.14, >= 9.0.0 and < 9.2.8, or >= 9.3.0 and < 9.3.3.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the listed affected ranges.
-
Identify if automatic import feature is in useReview Kibana configuration for saved objects imports, data imports, or dashboard imports initiated automatically. Check access logs for requests to import-related API endpoints (such as /api/saved_objects/_import, /api/import) with abnormally large parameter sizes.Affected if The automatic import feature is enabled and actively processing user requests with large parameter values.
-
Monitor for resource exhaustion signsObserve Kibana backend service CPU and memory consumption. Check for spikes in resource usage correlating with import operations, or look for increased error rates indicating service instability.Affected if Backend services show excessive resource consumption during import feature usage, leading to degraded availability.
You are affected if running a Kibana version in the affected ranges AND the automatic import feature is in use, enabling authenticated users to submit requests with excessively large values that cause service instability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.19.149.2.89.3.3
Implement input validation and size limits on the automatic import feature to restrict excessively large values; consider adding rate limiting or throttling for concurrent requests to prevent resource exhaustion.
Kibana 8.19.14 (for 8.x users), 9.2.8 (for 9.0-9.2.x users), or 9.3.3 (for 9.3.x users)
- Identify your current Kibana version using 'kibana --version' or the Kibana management UI
- Determine which version branch you are on (8.x or 9.x)
- For Kibana 8.15.0 to 8.19.13: upgrade to version 8.19.14
- For Kibana 9.0.0 to 9.2.7: upgrade to version 9.2.8
- For Kibana 9.3.0 to 9.3.2: upgrade to version 9.3.3
- After upgrading, verify the automatic import feature functions correctly
- Monitor for any service disruptions during and after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33459 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data